The inverse function is defined by:
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
To show
is well-defined, suppose that
and
. Then,
and
. Because
is well-defined,
has only one value. Hence,
and
. Because
is well-defined,
has only one value, so
, which shows that
is well-defined.
To show that
is 1-1, suppose that
.
Since g is 1-1,
Since f is 1-1,
, which implies that
is 1-1.
To show that
is onto, let
be a element of Z.
Since g is onto,
such that
Since f is onto,
such that
Hence
such that
, which means that
is onto.
Assume that
,
is a bijection from
to
.
| Base Case: | |
| From the previous problem, |
|
| Inductive Hypothesis: | |
| Assume that
|
|
| Inductive Step: | |
| Show: | |
|
|
|
| Proof: | |
| The function
|
|
|
|
|
| By the inductive hypothesis,
|
|
| Hence,
|
|
| QED | |
To show
is well-defined, consider that given any
,
exists because
is defined at all points of
, and
is defined at all points of
. Also, if
equals
and
simultaneously, then
and
simultaneously, which implies that
, since
is well-defined, and if
and
simultaneously, then
because
is well-defined. Hence,
is well-defined.
To show
is onto, let
. Because
is onto,
such that
. Because
is onto,
such that
. Hence,
, which means that
is onto.
To show that
is 1-1, Suppose that
.
By the definition of
,
and
. Because
is 1-1,
.
By the definition of
,
and
. Because
is 1-1,
.
Hence, since
and
,
, which means that
is 1-1.
Suppose that
is not 1-1. Then
such that
.
and
, which implies that
is not 1-1. This is a contradiction, so
must be 1-1.
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 99.1 release (March 30, 1999)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -show_section_numbers -split 0 -no_navigation -no_footnode h11ans
The translation was initiated by John Arras on 2001-11-14