CMSC 250 Fall 2001 Homework 5 solutions
- (8 points. 2 points each all or none.)
- Therefore, .25 can be written in the form a/b for some a,b
Z,b
0.
- Therefore, 25 can be written in the form
for some
- Therefore, CMSC250 is hard.
- Therefore,
is not greater than 1.
- (8 points. 2 points each, all or none.)
- Invalid - inverse error
- Invalid - converse error
- Valid - universal modus tollens
- Valid - universal modus ponens
- (4 free points.) This can be done in many ways. The final conclusion must come at the end. They do not have to have the intermediate conclusions.
- No one has moved to Somerset Town during the past year.
- Therefore, anyone who lives in Somerset Town today has lived there at least a year.
- Bob lives in Somerset Town today, and moved there on his 24th birthday.
- Therefore Bob is over the age of 20.
- Therefore Bob has lived in Somerset town at least a year.
- All people who lived in Somerset Town at least a year automatically become citizens of the town.
- Therefore, Bob is a citizen of Somerset Town.
- All citizens of somerset town over the age of 20 can run for the town council.
- Therefore, Bob can run for the town council.
- (12 points. 3 points each. 2 points for valid/invalid (no reason needed). 1 point for a correct picture.)
- Invalid - Not all animals can bite people.
- Valid - All dogs can bite people.
- Invalid - Some trucks may have wings.
- Valid - All natural numbers are complex numbers.
- (8 points. 4 points each. 2 points each for showing the De Morgan's and negation of quantification steps. It is ok if they leave out reasons.)
 |
Given |
 |
Double negation |
 |
Definition of negation |
 |
DeMorgan's law |
Hence,the given pair of statements are equivalent
 |
Given |
 |
Definition of negation |
 |
DeMorgans's law |
 |
definition of negation |
Hence,the given pair of statements are Equivalent.
- (10 points. -2 for each step that is incorrect, or not labeled with a reason and line numbers.)
Show that the following argument is valid by deducing the conclusion from the premises. Give justification for each step.
-
,
.
-
-
.
-
.
- Therefore
.
| 1. |
Q(a) |
instantiation using (d). |
| 2. |
P(a) |
Universal modus tollens using (a) and 1. |
| 3. |
R(a) P(a) |
Universal instantiation using 2. |
| 4. |
R(a) |
disjunctive syllogism using 2 and 3. |
| 5. |
S(a) |
Universal modus ponens using 4 and (c). |
| 6. |
 |
generalization using 5. |
| 7. |
 |
Defination of negation using 6. |
This document was generated using the
LaTeX2HTML translator Version 99.1 release (March 30, 1999)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -show_section_numbers -split 0 -no_navigation -no_footnode h5ans
The translation was initiated by John Arras on 2001-10-03
John Arras
2001-10-03