Year	Defendant	Region	Case Title	Plaintiff	Court	Topic	Primary Citation	
STRING	STRING+	STRING	STRING+	STRING+	STRING+	STRING+:HIER5	STRING+
1945	West	Northwest	International Capital Realty Inv. Co. v. West	International Capital Realty Inv. Co.	Ga.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	507 S.E.2d 545
1962	Hess	West	Mart v. Hess	Mart	Ind.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	703 N.E.2d 190
1948	West	East	International Capital Realty Inv. Co. v. West	International Capital Realty Inv. Co.	Ga.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	507 S.E.2d 545
1945	Hess	North	Mart v. Hess	Mart	Ind.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	703 N.E.2d 190
1945	MW Golden, Inc.	Northeast	Spectrum Pool Products, Inc. v. MW Golden, Inc.	Spectrum Pool Products, Inc.	Mont.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	968 P.2d 728
1954	West	Northwest	International Capital Realty Inv. Co. v. West	International Capital Realty Inv. Co.	Ga.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	507 S.E.2d 545
1962	MW Golden, Inc.	West	Spectrum Pool Products, Inc. v. MW Golden, Inc.	Spectrum Pool Products, Inc.	Mont.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	968 P.2d 728
1953	West	Southwest	International Capital Realty Inv. Co. v. West	International Capital Realty Inv. Co.	Ga.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	507 S.E.2d 545
1965	Teague	South	Walter Lorenz Surgical, Inc. v. Teague	Walter Lorenz Surgical, Inc.	Fla.App. 1 Dist.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	721 So.2d 358
1953	Hess	Northwest	Mart v. Hess	Mart	Ind.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	703 N.E.2d 190
1965	Bruno	South	Babn Technologies Corp. v. Bruno	Babn Technologies Corp.	E.D.Pa.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	25 F.Supp.2d 593
1948	MW Golden, Inc.	West	Spectrum Pool Products, Inc. v. MW Golden, Inc.	Spectrum Pool Products, Inc.	Mont.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k10 Jurisdiction of the person}	968 P.2d 728
1952	Spurr	East	Ostermiller v. Spurr	Ostermiller	Wyo.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k26 Scope and extent of jurisdiction in general}	968 P.2d 940
1948	Fantarella	Southwest	Krasowski v. Fantarella	Krasowski	Conn.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k28 Discretion of court as to exercise of jurisdiction}	720 A.2d 1123
1953	Bidwell	South	Sola v. Bidwell	Sola	Mo.App. W.D.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k31 Jurisdiction to be shown by record}	980 S.W.2d 60
1945	West	South	International Capital Realty Inv. Co. v. West	International Capital Realty Inv. Co.	Ga.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k34 Presumptions as to jurisdiction}	507 S.E.2d 545
1962	Hess	North	Mart v. Hess	Mart	Ind.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k34 Presumptions as to jurisdiction}	703 N.E.2d 190
1947	Bedsole	South	Thomas v. Bedsole	Thomas	Ala.Civ.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k37 Waiver of objections}	721 So.2d 222
1948	J.F.P	North	State ex rel. B.G. v. J.F.P	State ex rel. B.G.	Ala.Civ.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k37 Waiver of objections}	721 So.2d 213
1951	State	Northeast	Walton v. State	Walton	Colo.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k37 Waiver of objections}	968 P.2d 636
1951	Bidwell	East	Sola v. Bidwell	Sola	Mo.App. W.D.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k37 Waiver of objections}	980 S.W.2d 60
1962	J.F.P	Southwest	State ex rel. B.G. v. J.F.P	State ex rel. B.G.	Ala.Civ.App.	{106 COURTS:::106I NATURE, EXTENT, AND EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k39 Determination of questions of jurisdiction in general}	721 So.2d 213
1952	Kornmehl	South	Solondz v. Kornmehl	Solondz	N.J.Super.A.D.	{106 COURTS:::106II(A) CREATION AND CONSTITUTION:::106k50 Divisions and parts of courts}	721 A.2d 16
1952	DEFENDANT	South	In re Levon A.	PLAINTIFF	Md.App.	{106 COURTS:::106II(F) RULES OF COURT AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS:::106k85 Operation and effect of rules}	720 A.2d 1232
1945	DEFENDANT	Northeast	Ex parte City of Montgomery	PLAINTIFF	Ala.Crim.App.	{106 COURTS:::106II(F) RULES OF COURT AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS:::106k85 Operation and effect of rules}	721 So.2d 261
1950	Dell	North	Warehime v. Dell	Warehime	Md.App.	{106 COURTS:::106II(F) RULES OF COURT AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS:::106k85 Operation and effect of rules}	720 A.2d 1196
1948	Hope	North	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k88 Previous decisions as controlling or as precedents}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1965	City of Newport Beach	West	Tily B., Inc. v. City of Newport Beach	Tily B., Inc.	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k88 Previous decisions as controlling or as precedents}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 6
1952	Bidwell	South	Sola v. Bidwell	Sola	Mo.App. W.D.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k88 Previous decisions as controlling or as precedents}	980 S.W.2d 60
1946	Caldwell	East	State v. Caldwell	State	Mont.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k88 Previous decisions as controlling or as precedents}	968 P.2d 711
1960	DEFENDANT	Northeast	Matter of Estate of Egelhoff	PLAINTIFF	Wash.App. Div. 2	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k88 Previous decisions as controlling or as precedents}	968 P.2d 924
1945	Davis	North	State v. Davis	State	N.M.App.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k88 Previous decisions as controlling or as precedents}	968 P.2d 808
1945	Carter	Southwest	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k99 Previous decisions in same case as law of the case}	586 N.W.2d 818
1960	Reers	South	Gilligan v. Reers	Gilligan	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k99 Previous decisions in same case as law of the case}	680 N.Y.S.2d 621
1953	Reers	Southwest	Gilligan v. Reers	Gilligan	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k99 Previous decisions in same case as law of the case}	680 N.Y.S.2d 621
1948	U.S.	East	Streett v. U.S.	Streett	W.D.Va.	{106 COURTS:::106II(G) RULES OF DECISION:::106k99 Previous decisions in same case as law of the case}	25 F.Supp.2d 721
1947	Cook	West	Tillman v. Cook	Tillman	D.Utah	{106 COURTS:::106II(H) EFFECT OF REVERSAL OR OVERRULING:::106k100 In general}	25 F.Supp.2d 1245
1960	Williams	Southwest	People v. Williams	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{106 COURTS:::106II(H) EFFECT OF REVERSAL OR OVERRULING:::106k100 In general}	234 Ill.Dec. 521
1954	Neal	Northwest	People v. Neal	People	Mich.	{106 COURTS:::106II(H) EFFECT OF REVERSAL OR OVERRULING:::106k100 In general}	586 N.W.2d 716
1951	Alpine Sports, Inc.	Northwest	Stein v. Alpine Sports, Inc.	Stein	N.M.	{106 COURTS:::106II(H) EFFECT OF REVERSAL OR OVERRULING:::106k100 In general}	968 P.2d 769
1945	Tutoki	Northwest	Thirion v. Tutoki	Thirion	Ohio Mun.	{106 COURTS:::106IV COURTS OF LIMITED OR INFERIOR JURISDICTION:::106k174 Particular courts of special civil jurisdiction}	703 N.E.2d 378
1962	Hedrich	West	Hedrich v. Hedrich	Hedrich	Me.	{106 COURTS:::106IV COURTS OF LIMITED OR INFERIOR JURISDICTION:::106k191 District courts in cities, and other local district courts}	720 A.2d 1157
1948	Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa	East	Inzunza-Ortega v. Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa	Inzunza-Ortega	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{106 COURTS:::106VI(A) GROUNDS OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k207 Issuance of prerogative or remedial writs}	968 P.2d 631
1945	Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa	North	Emmons v. Superior Court In and For County of Maricopa	Emmons	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{106 COURTS:::106VI(A) GROUNDS OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k207 Issuance of prerogative or remedial writs}	968 P.2d 582
1945	Nadel	Northeast	State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel	State ex rel. Grove	Ohio	{106 COURTS:::106VI(A) GROUNDS OF JURISDICTION IN GENERAL:::106k207 Issuance of prerogative or remedial writs}	703 N.E.2d 304
1954	Nickerson	Northwest	People ex rel. Manning v. Nickerson	People ex rel. Manning	Ill.	{106 COURTS:::106VII(A)1 IN GENERAL:::106k472 Exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction}	234 Ill.Dec. 375
1962	Book Chevrolet, Inc.	West	General Motors Corp. v. Book Chevrolet, Inc.	General Motors Corp.	Ky.	{106 COURTS:::106VII(A)1 IN GENERAL:::106k472 Exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction}	979 S.W.2d 918
1953	State	Southwest	Garrett v. State	Garrett	Md.App.	{106 COURTS:::106VII(A)2 TRANSFER OF CAUSES:::106k488 Effect of transfer and proceedings had thereafter}	720 A.2d 1193
1965	Superior Court	South	County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court	County of Los Angeles	Cal.App. 2 Dist.	{106 COURTS:::106VII(B) STATE COURTS AND UNITED STATES COURTS:::106k489 Exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction}	80 Cal.Rptr.2d 860
1953	Schovee	Northwest	Mikolasko v. Schovee	Mikolasko	Md.App.	{108 COVENANTS:::108II(A) COVENANTS IN GENERAL:::108k31 Subject-matter in general}	720 A.2d 1214
1965	Schovee	South	Mikolasko v. Schovee	Mikolasko	Md.App.	{108 COVENANTS:::108II(A) COVENANTS IN GENERAL:::108k32 Limitations and exceptions in covenants}	720 A.2d 1214
1948	Schovee	West	Mikolasko v. Schovee	Mikolasko	Md.App.	{108 COVENANTS:::108II(C) COVENANTS AS TO USE OF REAL PROPERTY:::108k49 Nature and operation in general}	720 A.2d 1214
1952	Schovee	East	Mikolasko v. Schovee	Mikolasko	Md.App.	{108 COVENANTS:::108IV ACTIONS FOR BREACH:::108k117 Evidence}	720 A.2d 1214
1948	State	North	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(R) OPINION EVIDENCE:::110k482 Examination of experts}	721 So.2d 287
1951	Moreno	Northeast	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(R) OPINION EVIDENCE:::110k492 Effect of opinion evidence}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1951	State	East	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(R) OPINION EVIDENCE:::110k492 Effect of opinion evidence}	721 So.2d 287
1962	Cilberg	Southwest	People v. Cilberg	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(R) OPINION EVIDENCE:::110k492 Effect of opinion evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 697
1952	State	South	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)1 IN GENERAL:::110k507 Accomplices within rules of evidence}	968 P.2d 821
1952	State	South	Clemmons v. State	Clemmons	Md.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)1 IN GENERAL:::110k508 Admissibility and effect of testimony}	720 A.2d 1170
1945	McLaurin	Northeast	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)1 IN GENERAL:::110k508 Admissibility and effect of testimony}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1950	McLaurin	North	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k510 Necessity}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1948	DEFENDANT	North	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	968 P.2d 476
1965	State	West	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 514
1952	State	South	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 514
1946	McLaurin	East	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1960	McLaurin	Northeast	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1945	State	North	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	968 P.2d 821
1945	DEFENDANT	Southwest	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	968 P.2d 476
1960	State	South	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 514
1953	State	Southwest	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 514
1948	State	East	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	968 P.2d 821
1947	DEFENDANT	West	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	968 P.2d 476
1960	State	Southwest	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 514
1954	State	Northwest	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	968 P.2d 821
1951	State	Northwest	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k511 Sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 514
1945	State	Northwest	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(S)2 CORROBORATION:::110k512 Effect}	968 P.2d 821
1962	Woods	West	People v. Woods	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k517.1 Voluntary character of confession}	234 Ill.Dec. 423
1948	State	East	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k517.1 Voluntary character of confession}	721 So.2d 583
1945	State	North	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k517.1 Voluntary character of confession}	721 So.2d 650
1945	State	Northeast	Farley v. State	Farley	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k517.2 Absence or denial of counsel; inadequate representation}	507 S.E.2d 504
1954	Woods	Northwest	People v. Woods	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k519 Voluntary character in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 423
1962	State	West	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k519 Voluntary character in general}	703 N.E.2d 154
1953	State	Southwest	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k519 Voluntary character in general}	721 So.2d 650
1965	State	South	Quince v. State	Quince	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k519 Voluntary character in general}	721 So.2d 245
1953	State	Northwest	Ward v. State	Ward	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k520 Promises or other inducements}	507 S.E.2d 506
1965	State	South	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k520 Promises or other inducements}	721 So.2d 650
1948	Davis	West	State v. Davis	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k520 Promises or other inducements}	980 S.W.2d 92
1952	State	East	Ward v. State	Ward	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k522 Threats and fear}	507 S.E.2d 506
1948	State	Southwest	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k522 Threats and fear}	721 So.2d 650
1953	State	South	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k524 Mental incapacity}	721 So.2d 583
1945	Woods	South	People v. Woods	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k531 Preliminary evidence as to voluntary character}	234 Ill.Dec. 423
1962	State	North	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k531 Preliminary evidence as to voluntary character}	703 N.E.2d 154
1947	Woods	South	People v. Woods	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k531 Preliminary evidence as to voluntary character}	234 Ill.Dec. 423
1948	State	North	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k531 Preliminary evidence as to voluntary character}	703 N.E.2d 154
1951	State	Northeast	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k531 Preliminary evidence as to voluntary character}	721 So.2d 583
1951	State	East	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k531 Preliminary evidence as to voluntary character}	721 So.2d 650
1962	Woods	Southwest	People v. Woods	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(T) CONFESSIONS:::110k532 Determination of question of admissibility}	234 Ill.Dec. 423
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(U) EVIDENCE FROM PRIOR PROCEEDINGS:::110k540 Grounds for admission of former testimony}	586 N.W.2d 818
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(U) EVIDENCE FROM PRIOR PROCEEDINGS:::110k540 Grounds for admission of former testimony}	586 N.W.2d 818
1945	Carter	Northeast	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(U) EVIDENCE FROM PRIOR PROCEEDINGS:::110k540 Grounds for admission of former testimony}	586 N.W.2d 818
1950	State	North	Atkins v. State	Atkins	Ark.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XVII(V) WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY:::110k552 Circumstantial evidence}	979 S.W.2d 903
1945	Burton	Northeast	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1950	Hoskins	North	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	586 N.W.2d 707
1948	LaPena	North	State v. LaPena	State	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 750
1965	State	West	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 821
1952	Furlong	South	Romero v. Furlong	Romero	D.Colo.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	25 F.Supp.2d 1154
1946	U.S.	East	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1960	State	Northeast	Thomas v. State	Thomas	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	507 S.E.2d 523
1945	State	North	Randall v. State	Randall	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	507 S.E.2d 511
1945	Hoskins	Southwest	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	586 N.W.2d 707
1960	Cilberg	South	People v. Cilberg	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	680 N.Y.S.2d 697
1953	State	Southwest	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 821
1948	Moody	East	State v. Moody	State	Ariz.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 578
1947	Burton	West	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1960	U.S.	Southwest	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1954	DEFENDANT	Northwest	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 476
1951	State	Northwest	Henry v. State	Henry	Ga.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	507 S.E.2d 419
1945	State	Northwest	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	507 S.E.2d 514
1962	State	West	Randall v. State	Randall	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	507 S.E.2d 511
1948	LaPena	East	State v. LaPena	State	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 750
1945	Mitchelle	North	People v. Mitchelle	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	680 N.Y.S.2d 474
1945	Cilberg	Northeast	People v. Cilberg	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	680 N.Y.S.2d 697
1954	Hollis	Northwest	People v. Hollis	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	680 N.Y.S.2d 678
1962	State	West	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 821
1953	U.S.	Southwest	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1965	DEFENDANT	South	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	968 P.2d 476
1953	Burton	Northwest	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1965	Hoskins	South	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k641 Counsel for accused}	586 N.W.2d 707
1948	State	West	Ortega v. State	Ortega	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k642 Appointment and services of interpreter}	721 So.2d 350
1952	Jones	East	People v. Jones	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k651 View and inspection}	680 N.Y.S.2d 764
1948	Livoti	Southwest	U.S. v. Livoti	U.S.	S.D.N.Y.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(B) COURSE AND CONDUCT OF TRIAL IN GENERAL:::110k654 Remarks and conduct of judge}	25 F.Supp.2d 390
1953	Livoti	South	U.S. v. Livoti	U.S.	S.D.N.Y.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k661 Necessity and scope of proof}	25 F.Supp.2d 390
1945	State	South	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k661 Necessity and scope of proof}	703 N.E.2d 182
1962	Wheelock	North	Loitman v. Wheelock	Loitman	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k661 Necessity and scope of proof}	980 S.W.2d 140
1947	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k661 Necessity and scope of proof}	586 N.W.2d 818
1948	McClanahan	North	People v. McClanahan	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	234 Ill.Dec. 515
1951	McClanahan	Northeast	People v. McClanahan	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	234 Ill.Dec. 515
1951	Carter	East	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	586 N.W.2d 818
1962	Carter	Southwest	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	586 N.W.2d 818
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	586 N.W.2d 818
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	586 N.W.2d 818
1945	McClanahan	Northeast	People v. McClanahan	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k662 Right of accused to confront witnesses}	234 Ill.Dec. 515
1950	State	North	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k665 Separation and exclusion of witnesses}	721 So.2d 287
1948	State	North	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k665 Separation and exclusion of witnesses}	721 So.2d 287
1965	State	West	Brown v. State	Brown	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k665 Separation and exclusion of witnesses}	720 A.2d 1270
1952	State	South	Brown v. State	Brown	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k665 Separation and exclusion of witnesses}	720 A.2d 1270
1946	Carter	East	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k671 Presence of jury during inquiry as to admissibility}	586 N.W.2d 818
1960	Guidroz	Northeast	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k673 Effect of admission}	721 So.2d 480
1945	Guidroz	North	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k675 Cumulative evidence in general}	721 So.2d 480
1945	Hollis	Southwest	People v. Hollis	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k685 Reopening case for further evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 678
1960	Hollis	South	People v. Hollis	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(C) RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE:::110k685 Reopening case for further evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 678
1953	Semidey	Southwest	People v. Semidey	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(D) PROCEDURES FOR EXCLUDING EVIDENCE:::110k690 Right to object}	680 N.Y.S.2d 478
1948	Com.	East	McLean v. Com.	McLean	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k699 Control by court in general}	507 S.E.2d 640
1947	Butts	West	People v. Butts	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k700 Rights and duties of prosecuting attorney}	680 N.Y.S.2d 761
1960	Zuno-Arce	Southwest	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k700 Rights and duties of prosecuting attorney}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1954	Zuno-Arce	Northwest	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k700 Rights and duties of prosecuting attorney}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1951	Dollar	Northwest	U.S. v. Dollar	U.S.	N.D.Ala.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k700 Rights and duties of prosecuting attorney}	25 F.Supp.2d 1320
1945	Zuno-Arce	Northwest	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k705 Presentation of evidence}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1962	U.S.	West	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k705 Presentation of evidence}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1948	Mosley	East	State v. Mosley	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k705 Presentation of evidence}	980 S.W.2d 1
1945	Haffey	North	Cleveland v. Haffey	Cleveland	Ohio Mun.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k708 Scope and effect of summing up}	703 N.E.2d 380
1945	Hammer	Northeast	U.S. v. Hammer	U.S.	M.D.Pa.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k711 Limiting scope or time of argument}	25 F.Supp.2d 518
1954	Hammer	Northwest	U.S. v. Hammer	U.S.	M.D.Pa.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	25 F.Supp.2d 518
1962	State	West	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	721 So.2d 583
1953	Cook	Southwest	Tillman v. Cook	Tillman	D.Utah	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	25 F.Supp.2d 1245
1965	Hammer	South	U.S. v. Hammer	U.S.	M.D.Pa.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	25 F.Supp.2d 518
1953	State	Northwest	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	721 So.2d 583
1965	State	South	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	721 So.2d 583
1948	Sheppard	West	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	703 N.E.2d 286
1952	U.S.	East	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1948	U.S.	Southwest	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k712 Statements as to facts, comments, and arguments}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1953	Hammer	South	U.S. v. Hammer	U.S.	M.D.Pa.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	25 F.Supp.2d 518
1945	Cook	South	Tillman v. Cook	Tillman	D.Utah	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	25 F.Supp.2d 1245
1962	State	North	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	721 So.2d 287
1947	State	South	Heller v. State	Heller	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	507 S.E.2d 518
1948	State	North	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	721 So.2d 583
1951	State	Northeast	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	968 P.2d 739
1951	Sheppard	East	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	703 N.E.2d 286
1962	Cook	Southwest	Tillman v. Cook	Tillman	D.Utah	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	25 F.Supp.2d 1245
1952	Sheppard	South	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	703 N.E.2d 286
1952	Schmitz	South	People v. Schmitz	People	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	586 N.W.2d 766
1945	State	Northeast	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	721 So.2d 583
1950	McClanahan	North	People v. McClanahan	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k722 Comments on character or conduct}	234 Ill.Dec. 515
1948	Cook	North	Tillman v. Cook	Tillman	D.Utah	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k726 Retaliatory statements and remarks}	25 F.Supp.2d 1245
1965	Love	West	State v. Love	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k728 Objections and exceptions}	507 S.E.2d 577
1952	McClanahan	South	People v. McClanahan	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k730 Action of court}	234 Ill.Dec. 515
1946	Hammer	East	U.S. v. Hammer	U.S.	M.D.Pa.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k730 Action of court}	25 F.Supp.2d 518
1960	Hammer	Northeast	U.S. v. Hammer	U.S.	M.D.Pa.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XX(E) ARGUMENTS AND CONDUCT OF COUNSEL:::110k730 Action of court}	25 F.Supp.2d 518
1951	State	Northeast	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXI MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL:::110k915 Defects in indictment or information as ground for new trial}	507 S.E.2d 484
1951	State	East	Hennie v. State	Hennie	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXI MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL:::110k937 Newly discovered evidence}	968 P.2d 761
1962	State	Southwest	Hennie v. State	Hennie	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXI MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL:::110k937 Newly discovered evidence}	968 P.2d 761
1952	Sheppard	South	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXI MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL:::110k948 Application for new trial}	703 N.E.2d 286
1952	Sheppard	South	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXI MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL:::110k948 Application for new trial}	703 N.E.2d 286
1945	State	Northeast	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXII ARREST OF JUDGMENT:::110k967 Grounds for arrest of judgment}	507 S.E.2d 484
1950	State	North	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXII ARREST OF JUDGMENT:::110k967 Grounds for arrest of judgment}	507 S.E.2d 484
1948	Villalobos	North	State v. Villalobos	State	N.M.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	968 P.2d 766
1965	Com.	West	Green v. Com.	Green	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	507 S.E.2d 627
1952	State	South	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	507 S.E.2d 538
1946	State	East	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	507 S.E.2d 538
1960	Douglas	Northeast	People v. Douglas	People	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 551
1945	Green	North	People v. Green	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 781
1945	Green	Southwest	People v. Green	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 781
1960	Douglas	South	People v. Douglas	People	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 551
1953	Scanlon	Southwest	State v. Scanlon	State	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k982 Probation and suspension of sentence}	721 So.2d 392
1948	State	East	Brown v. State	Brown	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k983 Sentence of codefendants}	721 So.2d 274
1947	McLaurin	West	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k984 Sentence on conviction on different charges}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1960	U.S.	Southwest	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k984 Sentence on conviction on different charges}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1954	State	Northwest	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	721 So.2d 287
1951	State	Northwest	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	703 N.E.2d 154
1945	State	Northwest	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	703 N.E.2d 182
1962	Price	West	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	721 So.2d 511
1948	Hope	East	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1945	State	North	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	703 N.E.2d 154
1945	State	Northeast	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	703 N.E.2d 182
1954	Price	Northwest	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	721 So.2d 511
1962	Anonymous	West	People v. Anonymous	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 477
1953	State	Southwest	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	721 So.2d 287
1965	State	South	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	703 N.E.2d 182
1953	Price	Northwest	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k985 Formalities in pronouncing sentence}	721 So.2d 511
1965	State	South	Heidebur v. State	Heidebur	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k990 Requisites and sufficiency of sentence}	980 S.W.2d 138
1948	Collymore	West	People v. Collymore	People	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k996 Amendment or correction of record}	680 N.Y.S.2d 550
1952	State	East	Heidebur v. State	Heidebur	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k996 Amendment or correction of record}	980 S.W.2d 138
1948	Zuno-Arce	Southwest	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1953	U.S.	South	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1945	Zuno-Arce	South	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1962	U.S.	North	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1947	Zuno-Arce	South	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1948	Zuno-Arce	North	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1951	U.S.	Northeast	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 900
1951	Zuno-Arce	East	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1962	Zuno-Arce	Southwest	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1952	Zuno-Arce	South	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1952	Zuno-Arce	South	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1945	U.S.	Northeast	Levine v. U.S.	Levine	N.D.Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 905
1950	Zuno-Arce	North	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1948	Zuno-Arce	North	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1965	Zuno-Arce	West	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1952	Zuno-Arce	South	U.S. v. Zuno-Arce	U.S.	C.D.Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k997 Writ of error coram nobis}	25 F.Supp.2d 1087
1946	Reyes	East	People v. Reyes	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k998 Post-conviction relief;  setting aside judgment}	680 N.Y.S.2d 493
1960	State	Northeast	Lawrence v. State	Lawrence	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k998 Post-conviction relief;  setting aside judgment}	980 S.W.2d 135
1945	State	North	Carothers v. State	Carothers	Tenn.Cr.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIII JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, AND FINAL COMMITMENT:::110k998 Post-conviction relief;  setting aside judgment}	980 S.W.2d 215
1945	Caldwell	Southwest	State v. Caldwell	State	Mont.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(B) NATURE AND GROUNDS OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION:::110k1016 Appellate jurisdiction}	968 P.2d 711
1960	Caldwell	South	State v. Caldwell	State	Mont.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(C) DECISIONS REVIEWABLE:::110k1021 Decisions reviewable}	968 P.2d 711
1953	DEFENDANT	Southwest	In re Levon A.	PLAINTIFF	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(C) DECISIONS REVIEWABLE:::110k1021 Decisions reviewable}	720 A.2d 1232
1948	Newton	East	People v. Newton	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(C) DECISIONS REVIEWABLE:::110k1021 Decisions reviewable}	680 N.Y.S.2d 476
1947	Gray	West	State v. Gray	State	Fla.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(C) DECISIONS REVIEWABLE:::110k1021 Decisions reviewable}	721 So.2d 370
1960	Collymore	Southwest	People v. Collymore	People	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(D) RIGHT OF REVIEW:::110k1025 Right of defendant to review}	680 N.Y.S.2d 550
1954	Com.	Northwest	Cardwell v. Com.	Cardwell	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(D) RIGHT OF REVIEW:::110k1025 Right of defendant to review}	507 S.E.2d 625
1951	State	Northwest	Weakley v. State	Weakley	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(D) RIGHT OF REVIEW:::110k1025 Right of defendant to review}	721 So.2d 233
1945	DEFENDANT	Northwest	In re Levon A.	PLAINTIFF	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1028 Presentation of questions in general}	720 A.2d 1232
1962	State	West	Turner v. State	Turner	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1028 Presentation of questions in general}	721 So.2d 642
1948	State	East	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1028 Presentation of questions in general}	968 P.2d 739
1945	State	North	Floray v. State	Floray	Del.Supr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1030 Necessity of objections in general}	720 A.2d 1132
1945	State	Northeast	Lacey v. State	Lacey	Ga.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1030 Necessity of objections in general}	507 S.E.2d 441
1954	Davis	Northwest	State v. Davis	State	N.M.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1030 Necessity of objections in general}	968 P.2d 808
1962	State	West	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1032 Indictment or information}	507 S.E.2d 484
1953	State	Southwest	Cole v. State	Cole	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1035 Proceedings at trial in general}	721 So.2d 255
1965	Sears, Roebuck & Co.	South	Connors v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.	Connors	Fla.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1035 Proceedings at trial in general}	721 So.2d 418
1953	DEFENDANT	Northwest	Ex parte Deramus	PLAINTIFF	Ala.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1035 Proceedings at trial in general}	721 So.2d 242
1965	Hope	South	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1035 Proceedings at trial in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1948	Schmitz	West	People v. Schmitz	People	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1035 Proceedings at trial in general}	586 N.W.2d 766
1952	Jones	East	People v. Jones	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1035 Proceedings at trial in general}	680 N.Y.S.2d 764
1948	State	Southwest	Floray v. State	Floray	Del.Supr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	720 A.2d 1132
1953	Butts	South	People v. Butts	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 761
1945	State	South	Gibson v. State	Gibson	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	721 So.2d 363
1962	Butts	North	People v. Butts	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 761
1947	Wheelock	South	Loitman v. Wheelock	Loitman	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	980 S.W.2d 140
1948	State	North	Floray v. State	Floray	Del.Supr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	720 A.2d 1132
1951	State	Northeast	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	721 So.2d 287
1951	State	East	Bryant v. State	Bryant	Ga.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	507 S.E.2d 451
1962	State	Southwest	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	721 So.2d 287
1952	Joyner	South	People v. Joyner	People	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1036 Evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 548
1952	State	South	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	721 So.2d 287
1945	State	Northeast	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	721 So.2d 287
1950	McClanahan	North	People v. McClanahan	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	234 Ill.Dec. 515
1948	State	North	Turner v. State	Turner	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	721 So.2d 642
1965	Mosley	West	State v. Mosley	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	980 S.W.2d 1
1952	State	South	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	968 P.2d 739
1946	Pacheco	East	State v. Pacheco	State	N.M.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	968 P.2d 789
1960	State	Northeast	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1037 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	968 P.2d 821
1945	Moreno	North	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1945	State	Southwest	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	703 N.E.2d 154
1960	State	South	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	720 A.2d 1253
1953	State	Southwest	Deramus v. State	Deramus	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	721 So.2d 239
1948	Moreno	East	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1947	State	West	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	720 A.2d 1253
1960	State	Southwest	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1038 Instructions}	968 P.2d 739
1954	State	Northwest	Deramus v. State	Deramus	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1039 Custody and conduct of jury}	721 So.2d 239
1951	State	Northwest	Rice v. State	Rice	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1040 Verdict}	720 A.2d 1287
1945	State	Northwest	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1042 Sentence or judgment}	721 So.2d 287
1962	Hoskins	West	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1042 Sentence or judgment}	586 N.W.2d 707
1948	Norfleet	East	State v. Norfleet	State	La.App. 4 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1042 Sentence or judgment}	721 So.2d 506
1945	State	North	Lawrence v. State	Lawrence	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1042 Sentence or judgment}	980 S.W.2d 135
1945	Anonymous	Northeast	People v. Anonymous	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1042 Sentence or judgment}	680 N.Y.S.2d 477
1954	Douglas	Northwest	People v. Douglas	People	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1042 Sentence or judgment}	680 N.Y.S.2d 551
1962	State	West	Ward v. State	Ward	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1043 Scope and effect of objection}	507 S.E.2d 506
1953	Hope	Southwest	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1043 Scope and effect of objection}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1965	State	South	Quince v. State	Quince	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1043 Scope and effect of objection}	721 So.2d 245
1953	State	Northwest	Cole v. State	Cole	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	721 So.2d 255
1965	Maldonado	South	People v. Maldonado	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	680 N.Y.S.2d 676
1948	State	West	Gibson v. State	Gibson	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	721 So.2d 363
1952	State	East	Ward v. State	Ward	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	507 S.E.2d 506
1948	Haffey	Southwest	Cleveland v. Haffey	Cleveland	Ohio Mun.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	703 N.E.2d 380
1953	State	South	Turner v. State	Turner	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	721 So.2d 642
1945	Jones	South	State v. Jones	State	Wash.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)1 IN GENERAL:::110k1044 Motion presenting objection}	968 P.2d 888
1962	Hope	North	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)3 MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL OR IN ARREST:::110k1063 Necessity of motion for new trial or in arrest}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1947	Williams	South	People v. Williams	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)3 MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL OR IN ARREST:::110k1063 Necessity of motion for new trial or in arrest}	234 Ill.Dec. 521
1948	State	North	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)3 MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL OR IN ARREST:::110k1063 Necessity of motion for new trial or in arrest}	507 S.E.2d 484
1951	State	Northeast	Cole v. State	Cole	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)3 MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL OR IN ARREST:::110k1063 Necessity of motion for new trial or in arrest}	721 So.2d 255
1951	State	East	Turner v. State	Turner	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)3 MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL OR IN ARREST:::110k1063 Necessity of motion for new trial or in arrest}	721 So.2d 642
1962	Mosley	Southwest	State v. Mosley	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(E)3 MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL OR IN ARREST:::110k1063 Necessity of motion for new trial or in arrest}	980 S.W.2d 1
1952	DEFENDANT	South	In re Withdrawal of Attorney.	PLAINTIFF	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1077 Proceeding in forma pauperis}	586 N.W.2d 764
1952	Maldonado	South	People v. Maldonado	People	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1077 Proceeding in forma pauperis}	680 N.Y.S.2d 676
1945	Dayberry	Northeast	State v. Dayberry	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1077 Proceeding in forma pauperis}	507 S.E.2d 587
1950	State	North	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1081 Notice of appeal}	507 S.E.2d 538
1948	DEFENDANT	North	In re Withdrawal of Attorney.	PLAINTIFF	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1081 Notice of appeal}	586 N.W.2d 764
1965	DEFENDANT	West	In re Withdrawal of Attorney.	PLAINTIFF	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1083 Effect of transfer or proceedings therefor}	586 N.W.2d 764
1952	State	South	Attebury v. State	Attebury	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(F) PROCEEDINGS, GENERALLY:::110k1084 Supersedeas or stay of proceedings}	703 N.E.2d 175
1946	State	East	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)1 MATTERS TO BE SHOWN BY RECORD:::110k1086.4 Grounds of review in general}	507 S.E.2d 538
1960	DEFENDANT	Northeast	Ex parte Deramus	PLAINTIFF	Ala.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)1 MATTERS TO BE SHOWN BY RECORD:::110k1086.10 Matters relating to petit jury}	721 So.2d 242
1945	Love	North	State v. Love	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)1 MATTERS TO BE SHOWN BY RECORD:::110k1086.14 Presentation and reservation of grounds of review}	507 S.E.2d 577
1945	Guidroz	Southwest	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)2 SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF RECORD:::110k1088.1 In general}	721 So.2d 480
1960	Wheelock	South	Loitman v. Wheelock	Loitman	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)11 DEFECTS AND OBJECTIONS:::110k1109 In general}	980 S.W.2d 140
1953	Dayberry	Southwest	State v. Dayberry	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)12 AMENDMENT AND CORRECTION:::110k1110 In general}	507 S.E.2d 587
1948	Love	East	State v. Love	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)15 QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW:::110k1113 Questions presented for review}	507 S.E.2d 577
1947	Hoskins	West	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)15 QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW:::110k1113 Questions presented for review}	586 N.W.2d 707
1960	Mitchelle	Southwest	People v. Mitchelle	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(G)15 QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW:::110k1113 Questions presented for review}	680 N.Y.S.2d 474
1954	Carter	Northwest	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(H) ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS:::110k1129 In general}	586 N.W.2d 818
1951	Silvey	Northwest	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(I) BRIEFS:::110k1130 In general}	980 S.W.2d 103
1945	State	Northwest	Cole v. State	Cole	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(I) BRIEFS:::110k1130 In general}	721 So.2d 255
1962	State	West	Turner v. State	Turner	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(I) BRIEFS:::110k1130 In general}	721 So.2d 642
1948	Silvey	East	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(I) BRIEFS:::110k1130 In general}	980 S.W.2d 103
1945	Guytan	North	State v. Guytan	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(I) BRIEFS:::110k1130 In general}	968 P.2d 587
1945	State	Northeast	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(J) DISMISSAL:::110k1131 In general}	507 S.E.2d 538
1954	Dayberry	Northwest	State v. Dayberry	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(J) DISMISSAL:::110k1131 In general}	507 S.E.2d 587
1962	DEFENDANT	West	Ex parte City of Montgomery	PLAINTIFF	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(J) DISMISSAL:::110k1131 In general}	721 So.2d 261
1953	Moreno	Southwest	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1965	Burton	South	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1953	State	Northwest	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	703 N.E.2d 154
1965	State	South	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	720 A.2d 1253
1948	Price	West	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	721 So.2d 511
1952	State	East	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	720 A.2d 1253
1948	State	Southwest	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	721 So.2d 650
1953	Plastec, Inc.	South	State v. Plastec, Inc.	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	980 S.W.2d 152
1945	State	South	Heidebur v. State	Heidebur	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	980 S.W.2d 138
1962	Carter	North	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	586 N.W.2d 818
1947	LaPena	South	State v. LaPena	State	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	968 P.2d 750
1948	State	North	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	968 P.2d 739
1951	Sheppard	Northeast	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	703 N.E.2d 286
1951	State	East	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	968 P.2d 821
1962	State	Southwest	Cole v. State	Cole	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	721 So.2d 255
1952	State	South	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1134 Scope and extent in general}	507 S.E.2d 514
1952	Price	South	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1135 Parties entitled to allege error}	721 So.2d 511
1945	State	Northeast	Floray v. State	Floray	Del.Supr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	720 A.2d 1132
1950	Hoskins	North	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	586 N.W.2d 707
1948	State	North	Brown v. State	Brown	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	720 A.2d 1270
1965	Jensen	West	People v. Jensen	People	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	586 N.W.2d 748
1952	Com.	South	Sink v. Com.	Sink	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	507 S.E.2d 670
1946	Com.	East	Taylor v. Com.	Taylor	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	507 S.E.2d 661
1960	Megrey	Northeast	City of Seattle v. Megrey	City of Seattle	Wash.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(L) SCOPE OF REVIEW IN GENERAL:::110k1139 Additional proofs and trial de novo}	968 P.2d 900
1945	State	North	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1141 In general}	507 S.E.2d 514
1945	State	Southwest	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1141 In general}	507 S.E.2d 538
1960	DEFENDANT	South	In re Levon A.	PLAINTIFF	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1141 In general}	720 A.2d 1232
1953	Com.	Southwest	Taylor v. Com.	Taylor	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1141 In general}	507 S.E.2d 661
1948	State	East	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 538
1947	DEFENDANT	West	Ex parte Deramus	PLAINTIFF	Ala.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	721 So.2d 242
1960	State	Southwest	Adams v. State	Adams	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 538
1954	Love	Northwest	State v. Love	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 577
1951	State	Northwest	Brown v. State	Brown	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	720 A.2d 1270
1945	State	Northwest	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	720 A.2d 1253
1962	Davis	West	State v. Davis	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	980 S.W.2d 92
1948	Com.	East	Taylor v. Com.	Taylor	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 661
1945	State	North	VanVoorhis v. State	VanVoorhis	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 555
1945	State	Northeast	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 484
1954	Guytan	Northwest	State v. Guytan	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	968 P.2d 587
1962	State	West	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 514
1953	McLaurin	Southwest	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1965	Com.	South	Herrel v. Com.	Herrel	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 633
1953	Com.	Northwest	Lee v. Com.	Lee	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 629
1965	Silvey	South	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	980 S.W.2d 103
1948	Guytan	West	State v. Guytan	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	968 P.2d 587
1952	Moreno	East	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1948	State	Southwest	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	703 N.E.2d 154
1953	State	South	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	703 N.E.2d 182
1945	Silvey	South	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	980 S.W.2d 103
1962	Com.	North	Herrel v. Com.	Herrel	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 633
1947	Com.	South	Lee v. Com.	Lee	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	507 S.E.2d 629
1948	State	North	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	703 N.E.2d 154
1951	State	Northeast	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	703 N.E.2d 182
1951	Edwards	East	State v. Edwards	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	980 S.W.2d 75
1962	Burton	Southwest	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(M) PRESUMPTIONS:::110k1144 Facts or proceedings not shown by record}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1952	Burton	South	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1147 In general}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1952	State	South	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1147 In general}	703 N.E.2d 154
1945	Guidroz	Northeast	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1147 In general}	721 So.2d 480
1950	Wheelock	North	Loitman v. Wheelock	Loitman	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1147 In general}	980 S.W.2d 140
1948	State	North	Thorson v. State	Thorson	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1151 Continuance}	721 So.2d 590
1965	Martinez	West	State v. Martinez	State	Mont.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1151 Continuance}	968 P.2d 705
1952	Moody	South	State v. Moody	State	Ariz.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1152 Conduct of trial in general}	968 P.2d 578
1946	State	East	Floray v. State	Floray	Del.Supr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	720 A.2d 1132
1960	State	Northeast	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	703 N.E.2d 182
1945	State	North	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	720 A.2d 1253
1945	State	Southwest	Thorson v. State	Thorson	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	721 So.2d 590
1960	Wheelock	South	Loitman v. Wheelock	Loitman	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	980 S.W.2d 140
1953	Carter	Southwest	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	586 N.W.2d 818
1948	State	East	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1153 Reception of evidence}	968 P.2d 821
1947	State	West	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1155 Custody and conduct of jury}	968 P.2d 739
1960	Pacheco	Southwest	State v. Pacheco	State	N.M.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1155 Custody and conduct of jury}	968 P.2d 789
1954	State	Northwest	Hill v. State	Hill	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(N) DISCRETION OF LOWER COURT:::110k1156 New trial}	721 So.2d 249
1951	State	Northwest	Ward v. State	Ward	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	507 S.E.2d 506
1945	State	Northwest	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	721 So.2d 650
1962	State	West	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	968 P.2d 821
1948	Com.	East	Sink v. Com.	Sink	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	507 S.E.2d 670
1945	Megrey	North	City of Seattle v. Megrey	City of Seattle	Wash.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	968 P.2d 900
1945	Beard	Northeast	State v. Beard	State	W.Va.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	507 S.E.2d 688
1954	Burton	Northwest	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1962	Sheppard	West	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	703 N.E.2d 286
1953	State	Southwest	Thorson v. State	Thorson	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	721 So.2d 590
1965	State	South	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	721 So.2d 650
1953	State	Northwest	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	703 N.E.2d 154
1965	State	South	Brown v. State	Brown	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	720 A.2d 1270
1948	State	West	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	720 A.2d 1253
1952	State	East	Thorson v. State	Thorson	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	721 So.2d 590
1948	State	Southwest	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	721 So.2d 583
1953	State	South	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	721 So.2d 650
1945	Davis	South	State v. Davis	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(O) QUESTIONS OF FACT AND FINDINGS:::110k1158 In general}	980 S.W.2d 92
1962	State	North	Peek v. State	Peek	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 553
1947	State	South	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 514
1948	McLaurin	North	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1951	Com.	Northeast	Herrel v. Com.	Herrel	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 633
1951	Moreno	East	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1962	McLaurin	Southwest	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1952	State	South	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	703 N.E.2d 154
1952	State	South	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	703 N.E.2d 182
1945	Norfleet	Northeast	State v. Norfleet	State	La.App. 4 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	721 So.2d 506
1950	State	North	Peek v. State	Peek	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 553
1948	State	North	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 514
1965	State	West	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 484
1952	State	South	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	703 N.E.2d 154
1946	State	East	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	703 N.E.2d 182
1960	Silvey	Northeast	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	980 S.W.2d 103
1945	State	North	Farley v. State	Farley	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 504
1945	State	Southwest	Johnson v. State	Johnson	Miss.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	721 So.2d 650
1960	Silvey	South	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	980 S.W.2d 103
1953	State	Southwest	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 484
1948	State	East	Farley v. State	Farley	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 504
1947	State	West	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 484
1960	State	Southwest	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	703 N.E.2d 182
1954	Silvey	Northwest	State v. Silvey	State	Mo.App. S.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	980 S.W.2d 103
1951	Coardes	Northwest	State v. Coardes	State	Conn.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	720 A.2d 1120
1945	State	Northwest	Peek v. State	Peek	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 553
1962	State	West	Short v. State	Short	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 514
1948	State	East	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	703 N.E.2d 154
1945	State	North	VanVoorhis v. State	VanVoorhis	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(P) VERDICTS:::110k1159 Conclusiveness of verdict}	507 S.E.2d 555
1945	Guidroz	Northeast	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1162 Prejudice to rights of party as ground of review}	721 So.2d 480
1954	State	Northwest	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1162 Prejudice to rights of party as ground of review}	720 A.2d 1253
1962	State	West	Salinas v. State	Salinas	Tex.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1162 Prejudice to rights of party as ground of review}	980 S.W.2d 219
1953	Sheppard	Southwest	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1163 Presumption as to effect of error}	703 N.E.2d 286
1965	State	South	Weakley v. State	Weakley	Ala.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166 Preliminary proceedings}	721 So.2d 235
1953	State	Northwest	Weakley v. State	Weakley	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166 Preliminary proceedings}	721 So.2d 233
1965	State	South	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166 Preliminary proceedings}	968 P.2d 821
1948	Love	West	State v. Love	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166 Preliminary proceedings}	507 S.E.2d 577
1952	State	East	Gibson v. State	Gibson	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166 Preliminary proceedings}	721 So.2d 363
1948	Moody	Southwest	State v. Moody	State	Ariz.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166.5 Conduct of trial in general}	968 P.2d 578
1953	Coleman	South	People v. Coleman	People	Ill.App. 5 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166.5 Conduct of trial in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 525
1945	Guytan	South	State v. Guytan	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166.5 Conduct of trial in general}	968 P.2d 587
1962	Hope	North	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166.5 Conduct of trial in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1947	Schmitz	South	People v. Schmitz	People	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1166.5 Conduct of trial in general}	586 N.W.2d 766
1948	Com.	North	Sims v. Com.	Sims	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1167 Rulings as to indictment or pleas}	507 S.E.2d 648
1951	State	Northeast	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1168 Rulings as to evidence in general}	968 P.2d 821
1951	Beard	East	State v. Beard	State	W.Va.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	507 S.E.2d 688
1962	State	Southwest	Bryant v. State	Bryant	Ga.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	507 S.E.2d 451
1952	State	South	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	968 P.2d 821
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	586 N.W.2d 818
1945	State	Northeast	Clemmons v. State	Clemmons	Md.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	720 A.2d 1170
1950	Crump	North	People v. Crump	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	680 N.Y.S.2d 765
1948	Cayton	North	State v. Cayton	State	La.App. 3 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	721 So.2d 542
1965	Guidroz	West	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	721 So.2d 480
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	586 N.W.2d 818
1946	State	East	Ortega v. State	Ortega	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	721 So.2d 350
1960	State	Northeast	McAllister v. State	McAllister	Ga.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	507 S.E.2d 448
1945	Beard	North	State v. Beard	State	W.Va.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1169 Admission of evidence}	507 S.E.2d 688
1945	State	Southwest	West v. State	West	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1170 Exclusion of evidence}	720 A.2d 1253
1960	Matz	South	People v. Matz	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1170.5 Examination of witnesses}	80 Cal.Rptr.2d 872
1953	McLaurin	Southwest	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1170.5 Examination of witnesses}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1948	State	East	Peek v. State	Peek	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1170.5 Examination of witnesses}	507 S.E.2d 553
1947	Crump	West	People v. Crump	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	680 N.Y.S.2d 765
1960	State	Southwest	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	968 P.2d 821
1954	State	Northwest	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	721 So.2d 583
1951	Crump	Northwest	People v. Crump	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	680 N.Y.S.2d 765
1945	State	Northwest	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	968 P.2d 821
1962	State	West	Turner v. State	Turner	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	721 So.2d 642
1948	State	East	Dancer v. State	Dancer	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	721 So.2d 583
1945	Sheppard	North	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1171 Arguments and conduct of counsel}	703 N.E.2d 286
1945	Moreno	Northeast	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1172 Instructions}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1954	Bender	Northwest	People v. Bender	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1172 Instructions}	680 N.Y.S.2d 479
1962	State	West	Floray v. State	Floray	Del.Supr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1172 Instructions}	720 A.2d 1132
1953	Emmal	Southwest	People v. Emmal	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1172 Instructions}	80 Cal.Rptr.2d 907
1965	State	South	Caruthers v. State	Caruthers	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1173 Failure or refusal to give instructions}	721 So.2d 371
1953	State	Northwest	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1173 Failure or refusal to give instructions}	721 So.2d 287
1965	Nichols	South	People v. Nichols	People	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1173 Failure or refusal to give instructions}	680 N.Y.S.2d 762
1948	State	West	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1173 Failure or refusal to give instructions}	968 P.2d 821
1952	Guytan	East	State v. Guytan	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1174 Conduct and deliberations of jury}	968 P.2d 587
1948	Com.	Southwest	McLean v. Com.	McLean	Va.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1174 Conduct and deliberations of jury}	507 S.E.2d 640
1953	State	South	Hill v. State	Hill	Ala.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1174 Conduct and deliberations of jury}	721 So.2d 249
1945	Sheppard	South	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1174 Conduct and deliberations of jury}	703 N.E.2d 286
1962	Burton	North	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1177 Sentence and judgment and proceedings after judgment}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1947	State	South	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(Q) HARMLESS AND REVERSIBLE ERROR:::110k1177 Sentence and judgment and proceedings after judgment}	968 P.2d 821
1948	State	North	Salinas v. State	Salinas	Tex.Crim.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(S) DECISIONS OF INTERMEDIATE COURTS:::110k1179 In general}	980 S.W.2d 219
1951	State	Northeast	Farber v. State	Farber	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(T) SUBSEQUENT APPEALS:::110k1180 In general}	703 N.E.2d 151
1951	Plastec, Inc.	East	State v. Plastec, Inc.	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(T) SUBSEQUENT APPEALS:::110k1180 In general}	980 S.W.2d 152
1962	Carter	Southwest	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(T) SUBSEQUENT APPEALS:::110k1180 In general}	586 N.W.2d 818
1952	Williams	South	People v. Williams	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1181 Decision in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 521
1952	Dayberry	South	State v. Dayberry	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1181.5 Remand in general;  vacation}	507 S.E.2d 587
1945	Guidroz	Northeast	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1181.5 Remand in general;  vacation}	721 So.2d 480
1950	Cain	North	State v. Cain	State	Mo.App. E.D.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1181.5 Remand in general;  vacation}	980 S.W.2d 145
1948	State	North	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1185 Reversal}	968 P.2d 821
1965	State	West	Thorson v. State	Thorson	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1192 Mandate and proceedings in lower court}	721 So.2d 590
1952	Carter	South	State v. Carter	State	Neb.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIV(U) DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF CAUSE:::110k1192 Mandate and proceedings in lower court}	586 N.W.2d 818
1946	Hernandez	East	U.S. v. Hernandez	U.S.	S.D.Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(A) IN GENERAL:::110k1202.2 Offenses subject to enhancement;  statute to be applied}	25 F.Supp.2d 1369
1960	Moreno	Northeast	People v. Moreno	People	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(A) IN GENERAL:::110k1202.5 Convictions, sentences, or commitments usable for enhancement, in general}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 24
1945	State	North	Price v. State	Price	Fla.App. 5 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(A) IN GENERAL:::110k1202.9 Time and order of prior offense or adjudication}	721 So.2d 360
1945	Villalobos	Southwest	State v. Villalobos	State	N.M.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.5 Time for instituting proceedings}	968 P.2d 766
1960	State	South	Attebury v. State	Attebury	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.7 Charging prior offense}	703 N.E.2d 175
1953	State	Southwest	Williams v. State	Williams	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.7 Charging prior offense}	980 S.W.2d 222
1948	State	East	Williams v. State	Williams	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.10 Evidence}	980 S.W.2d 222
1947	State	West	Williams v. State	Williams	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.10 Evidence}	980 S.W.2d 222
1960	State	Southwest	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.26 Review}	507 S.E.2d 484
1954	Hernandez	Northwest	U.S. v. Hernandez	U.S.	S.D.Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.32 Punishment}	25 F.Supp.2d 1369
1951	Cassells	Northwest	People v. Cassells	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.32 Punishment}	680 N.Y.S.2d 480
1945	Bender	Northwest	People v. Bender	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXV(B) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1203.32 Punishment}	680 N.Y.S.2d 479
1962	Price	West	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1205 Nature and grounds of punishment in general}	721 So.2d 511
1948	Burton	East	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1206 Constitutional and statutory provisions}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1945	Koppa	North	People v. Koppa	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1206 Constitutional and statutory provisions}	234 Ill.Dec. 479
1945	Espinoza	Northeast	People v. Espinoza	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1206 Constitutional and statutory provisions}	234 Ill.Dec. 372
1954	Koppa	Northwest	People v. Koppa	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1206 Constitutional and statutory provisions}	234 Ill.Dec. 479
1962	Espinoza	West	People v. Espinoza	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1206 Constitutional and statutory provisions}	234 Ill.Dec. 372
1953	Price	Southwest	State v. Price	State	La.App. 2 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	721 So.2d 511
1965	Guidroz	South	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	721 So.2d 480
1953	Burton	Northwest	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1965	State	South	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	721 So.2d 287
1948	Burton	West	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1952	DEFENDANT	East	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	968 P.2d 476
1948	Burton	Southwest	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1953	McLaurin	South	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1945	Hope	South	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1962	State	North	McKenna v. State	McKenna	Nev.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	968 P.2d 739
1947	Sheppard	South	State v. Sheppard	State	Ohio	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	703 N.E.2d 286
1948	State	North	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	703 N.E.2d 154
1951	State	Northeast	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	703 N.E.2d 182
1951	Guidroz	East	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	721 So.2d 480
1962	Guidroz	Southwest	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	721 So.2d 480
1952	DEFENDANT	South	In re Levon A.	PLAINTIFF	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	720 A.2d 1232
1952	Cornish	South	State v. Cornish	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	968 P.2d 606
1945	Galvan	Northeast	People v. Galvan	People	Cal.App. 1 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	80 Cal.Rptr.2d 853
1950	Williams	North	People v. Williams	People	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 521
1948	Koppa	North	People v. Koppa	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1208 Extent of punishment in general}	234 Ill.Dec. 479
1965	State	West	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	703 N.E.2d 182
1952	McLaurin	South	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1946	State	East	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	703 N.E.2d 182
1960	Cornish	Northeast	State v. Cornish	State	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	968 P.2d 606
1945	State	North	Berry v. State	Berry	Ind.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	703 N.E.2d 154
1945	State	Southwest	Adkins v. State	Adkins	Ind.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	703 N.E.2d 182
1960	Bellamy	South	People v. Bellamy	People	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1210 Cumulative or consecutive sentences}	680 N.Y.S.2d 481
1953	Hoskins	Southwest	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	586 N.W.2d 707
1948	State	East	Wilson v. State	Wilson	Tenn.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	980 S.W.2d 196
1947	State	West	Knight v. State	Knight	Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	721 So.2d 287
1960	Burton	Southwest	People v. Burton	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	234 Ill.Dec. 437
1954	Hope	Northwest	People v. Hope	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	234 Ill.Dec. 379
1951	State	Northwest	Cummings v. State	Cummings	Okl.Cr.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	968 P.2d 821
1945	Hoskins	Northwest	State v. Hoskins	State	Iowa	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	586 N.W.2d 707
1962	State	West	Gibson v. State	Gibson	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	721 So.2d 363
1948	Love	East	State v. Love	State	N.C.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	507 S.E.2d 577
1945	McLaurin	North	People v. McLaurin	People	Ill.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	234 Ill.Dec. 399
1945	DEFENDANT	Northeast	In re 1650 Cases of Seized Liquor	PLAINTIFF	Vt.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1213 Cruel or unusual punishment}	721 A.2d 100
1954	State ex rel. Moore	Northwest	One (1) Charter Arms, Bulldog 44 Special, Serial No. 794774 v. State ex rel. Moore	One (1) Charter Arms, Bulldog 44 Special, Serial No. 794774	Miss.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1214 Excessive fines}	721 So.2d 620
1962	DEFENDANT	West	In re 1650 Cases of Seized Liquor	PLAINTIFF	Vt.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVI PUNISHMENT OF CRIME:::110k1214 Excessive fines}	721 A.2d 100
1953	State	Southwest	Jackson v. State	Jackson	Md.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXVIII CRIMINAL RECORDS:::110k1226 In general}	720 A.2d 1210
1965	Schmitz	South	People v. Schmitz	People	Mich.App.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIX(A) IN GENERAL:::110k1242 Base offense levels or scores;  computation}	586 N.W.2d 766
1953	Hernandez	Northwest	U.S. v. Hernandez	U.S.	S.D.Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIX(C)2 UPWARD DEPARTURES:::110k1284 Factors related to offender}	25 F.Supp.2d 1369
1965	Hernandez	South	U.S. v. Hernandez	U.S.	S.D.Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIX(C)2 UPWARD DEPARTURES:::110k1284 Factors related to offender}	25 F.Supp.2d 1369
1948	Hernandez	West	U.S. v. Hernandez	U.S.	S.D.Fla.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIX(C)2 UPWARD DEPARTURES:::110k1284 Factors related to offender}	25 F.Supp.2d 1369
1952	Scanlon	East	State v. Scanlon	State	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIX(C)3 DOWNWARD DEPARTURES:::110k1296 Factors related to offender}	721 So.2d 392
1948	Guidroz	Southwest	State v. Guidroz	State	La.App. 5 Cir.	{110 CRIMINAL LAW:::110XXIX(D) PROCEEDINGS:::110k1318 Findings;  reasons}	721 So.2d 480
1953	General Mills, Inc.	South	Smith v. General Mills, Inc.	Smith	Mont.	{111 CROPS:::111k3 Contracts:::}	968 P.2d 723
1945	Langlois	South	Myers v. Langlois	Myers	Vt.	{115 DAMAGES:::115I NATURE AND GROUNDS IN GENERAL:::115k2 What law governs}	721 A.2d 129
1962	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	North	Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Westphal	Cal.App. 3 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115I NATURE AND GROUNDS IN GENERAL:::115k5 General and special damage}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 46
1947	Saibaba Corp.	South	Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.	Woodhull Corp.	Ga.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(A)1 IN GENERAL:::115k15 Nature and theory of compensation}	507 S.E.2d 493
1948	City of New York	North	Mollerson v. City of New York	Mollerson	N.Y.Sup.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(A)2 MENTAL SUFFERING:::115k50.10 Intentional, reckless, or outrageous conduct}	680 N.Y.S.2d 800
1951	Walgreen Hastings Co.	Northeast	Fernandez v. Walgreen Hastings Co.	Fernandez	N.M.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(A)2 MENTAL SUFFERING:::115k51 Injury or threat to another}	968 P.2d 774
1951	Camel Contractors, Inc.	East	Begnaud v. Camel Contractors, Inc.	Begnaud	La.App. 3 Cir.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(A)2 MENTAL SUFFERING:::115k55 Injury to property}	721 So.2d 550
1962	American States Ins. Co.	Southwest	Smith v. American States Ins. Co.	Smith	Minn.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(B) AGGRAVATION, MITIGATION, AND REDUCTION OF LOSS:::115k59 Matter of mitigation;  collateral source rule in general}	586 N.W.2d 784
1952	Nordic Toyota, Inc.	South	Schnabel v. Nordic Toyota, Inc.	Schnabel	Vt.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(B) AGGRAVATION, MITIGATION, AND REDUCTION OF LOSS:::115k62 Duty of person injured to prevent or reduce damage}	721 A.2d 114
1952	Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	South	Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Thayer	Mass.App.Ct.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(B) AGGRAVATION, MITIGATION, AND REDUCTION OF LOSS:::115k63 Reparation by wrongdoer}	703 N.E.2d 221
1945	Kawasaki Motors Corp.	Northeast	Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.	Whalen	N.Y.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(B) AGGRAVATION, MITIGATION, AND REDUCTION OF LOSS:::115k63 Reparation by wrongdoer}	680 N.Y.S.2d 435
1950	Slavin	North	Baumgarten v. Slavin	Baumgarten	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(B) AGGRAVATION, MITIGATION, AND REDUCTION OF LOSS:::115k63 Reparation by wrongdoer}	680 N.Y.S.2d 658
1948	American States Ins. Co.	North	Smith v. American States Ins. Co.	Smith	Minn.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115III(B) AGGRAVATION, MITIGATION, AND REDUCTION OF LOSS:::115k64 Reduction of loss by insurance}	586 N.W.2d 784
1965	Saibaba Corp.	West	Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.	Woodhull Corp.	Ga.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IV LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND PENALTIES:::115k75 Construction of stipulations}	507 S.E.2d 493
1952	Hall	South	Archer v. Hall	Archer	Ala.Civ.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IV LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND PENALTIES:::115k75 Construction of stipulations}	721 So.2d 194
1946	Nordic Toyota, Inc.	East	Schnabel v. Nordic Toyota, Inc.	Schnabel	Vt.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k87 Nature and theory of damages additional to compensation}	721 A.2d 114
1960	Saibaba Corp.	Northeast	Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.	Woodhull Corp.	Ga.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k88 Injuries for which exemplary damages may be awarded}	507 S.E.2d 493
1945	Johnson	North	Cirrincione v. Johnson	Cirrincione	Ill.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k88 Injuries for which exemplary damages may be awarded}	234 Ill.Dec. 455
1945	Johnson	Southwest	Cirrincione v. Johnson	Cirrincione	Ill.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k91 Grounds for exemplary damages}	234 Ill.Dec. 455
1960	International Paper Co.	South	Burr v. International Paper Co.	Burr	La.App. 3 Cir.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k91 Grounds for exemplary damages}	721 So.2d 532
1953	Nordic Toyota, Inc.	Southwest	Schnabel v. Nordic Toyota, Inc.	Schnabel	Vt.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k91 Grounds for exemplary damages}	721 A.2d 114
1948	Johnson	East	Cirrincione v. Johnson	Cirrincione	Ill.	{115 DAMAGES:::115V EXEMPLARY DAMAGES:::115k91 Grounds for exemplary damages}	234 Ill.Dec. 455
1947	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	West	Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Westphal	Cal.App. 3 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VI(A) INJURIES TO THE PERSON:::115k96 Discretion as to amount of damages}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 46
1960	Milby	Southwest	Morris v. Milby	Morris	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VI(A) INJURIES TO THE PERSON:::115k100 Impairment of earning capacity}	234 Ill.Dec. 509
1954	Rockwell Intern. Corp.	Northwest	Daily News, L.P. v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.	Daily News, L.P.	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VI(C) BREACH OF CONTRACT:::115k118 Effect of provisions of contract}	680 N.Y.S.2d 510
1951	Byrd	Northwest	Berg v. Byrd	Berg	Md.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k127 Limitations as to amount}	720 A.2d 1283
1945	State	Northwest	Kotler v. State	Kotler	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	680 N.Y.S.2d 586
1962	Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.	West	Smallwood v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.	Smallwood	Ohio Ct.Cl.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	703 N.E.2d 360
1948	Friedman	East	Maisonaves v. Friedman	Maisonaves	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	680 N.Y.S.2d 619
1945	Klenetsky	North	DePasquale v. Klenetsky	DePasquale	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	680 N.Y.S.2d 666
1945	Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Northeast	Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Thayer	Mass.App.Ct.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	703 N.E.2d 221
1954	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Northwest	Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Westphal	Cal.App. 3 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 46
1962	Donat	West	Jordan v. Donat	Jordan	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	680 N.Y.S.2d 501
1953	Lehman	Southwest	Porcano v. Lehman	Porcano	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	680 N.Y.S.2d 590
1965	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	South	Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Westphal	Cal.App. 3 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 46
1953	Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership	Northwest	Sheppard v. Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership	Sheppard	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	968 P.2d 612
1965	Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	South	Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Thayer	Mass.App.Ct.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	703 N.E.2d 221
1948	State	West	Kotler v. State	Kotler	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	680 N.Y.S.2d 586
1952	Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	East	Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Thayer	Mass.App.Ct.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	703 N.E.2d 221
1948	Triplett	Southwest	Miller v. Triplett	Miller	W.Va.	{115 DAMAGES:::115VII INADEQUATE AND EXCESSIVE DAMAGES:::115k129 Injuries to the person}	507 S.E.2d 714
1953	J.S. Latta Co.	South	American Laminates, Inc. v. J.S. Latta Co.	American Laminates, Inc.	Mo.App. W.D.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k163 Presumptions and burden of proof}	980 S.W.2d 12
1945	Antoine Nat. Bank	South	Fitzgerald v. Antoine Nat. Bank	Fitzgerald	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k163 Presumptions and burden of proof}	980 S.W.2d 228
1962	J.S. Latta Co.	North	American Laminates, Inc. v. J.S. Latta Co.	American Laminates, Inc.	Mo.App. W.D.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k163 Presumptions and burden of proof}	980 S.W.2d 12
1947	Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership	South	Sheppard v. Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership	Sheppard	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k164 Admissibility}	968 P.2d 612
1948	Milby	North	Morris v. Milby	Morris	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k164 Admissibility}	234 Ill.Dec. 509
1951	Antoine Nat. Bank	Northeast	Fitzgerald v. Antoine Nat. Bank	Fitzgerald	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	980 S.W.2d 228
1951	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	East	Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Westphal	Cal.App. 3 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 46
1962	Cooper	Southwest	Johnson v. Cooper	Johnson	Ga.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	507 S.E.2d 559
1952	Bourn	South	McNeil v. Bourn	McNeil	Miss.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	721 So.2d 663
1952	Bedard	South	Albrecht v. Bedard	Albrecht	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	680 N.Y.S.2d 788
1945	Gray Dorchester Associates	Northeast	Diglio v. Gray Dorchester Associates	Diglio	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	680 N.Y.S.2d 786
1950	Bedard	North	Albrecht v. Bedard	Albrecht	N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	680 N.Y.S.2d 788
1948	Milby	North	Morris v. Milby	Morris	Ill.App. 4 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	234 Ill.Dec. 509
1965	J.S. Latta Co.	West	American Laminates, Inc. v. J.S. Latta Co.	American Laminates, Inc.	Mo.App. W.D.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	980 S.W.2d 12
1952	Camel Contractors, Inc.	South	Begnaud v. Camel Contractors, Inc.	Begnaud	La.App. 3 Cir.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	721 So.2d 550
1946	Bourn	East	McNeil v. Bourn	McNeil	Miss.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	721 So.2d 663
1960	Bourn	Northeast	McNeil v. Bourn	McNeil	Miss.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115IX EVIDENCE:::115k183 Weight and sufficiency}	721 So.2d 663
1945	Equity Transp. Co., Inc.	North	Bushansky v. Equity Transp. Co., Inc.	Bushansky	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k206 Physical or mental examination of person injured}	680 N.Y.S.2d 641
1945	Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership	Southwest	Sheppard v. Crow-Barker Paul No. 1 Ltd. Partnership	Sheppard	Ariz.App. Div. 1	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k208 Questions for jury}	968 P.2d 612
1960	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	South	Westphal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.	Westphal	Cal.App. 3 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k208 Questions for jury}	81 Cal.Rptr.2d 46
1953	Lyons	Southwest	Gross v. Lyons	Gross	Fla.App. 4 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k208 Questions for jury}	721 So.2d 304
1948	Byrd	East	Berg v. Byrd	Berg	Md.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k208 Questions for jury}	720 A.2d 1283
1947	Johnson	West	Cirrincione v. Johnson	Cirrincione	Ill.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k208 Questions for jury}	234 Ill.Dec. 455
1960	Lyons	Southwest	Gross v. Lyons	Gross	Fla.App. 4 Dist.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k209 Instructions}	721 So.2d 304
1954	Cooper	Northwest	Johnson v. Cooper	Johnson	Ga.App.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k209 Instructions}	507 S.E.2d 559
1951	Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Northwest	Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Thayer	Mass.App.Ct.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k209 Instructions}	703 N.E.2d 221
1945	Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Northwest	Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.	Thayer	Mass.App.Ct.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k209 Instructions}	703 N.E.2d 221
1962	Klenetsky	West	DePasquale v. Klenetsky	DePasquale	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{115 DAMAGES:::115X PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT:::115k224 Setting aside inquest or assessment}	680 N.Y.S.2d 666
1948	Numed Inc.	East	Monroe v. Numed Inc.	Monroe	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{117 DEATH:::117III(A) RIGHT OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::117k8 What law governs}	680 N.Y.S.2d 707
1945	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	North	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(A) RIGHT OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::117k20 Defenses}	980 S.W.2d 4
1945	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Northeast	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(A) RIGHT OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::117k20 Defenses}	980 S.W.2d 4
1954	Sheehan Memorial Hosp.	Northwest	Boles v. Sheehan Memorial Hosp.	Boles	N.Y.Sup.	{117 DEATH:::117III(D) LIMITATIONS:::117k39 Computation of period of limitation}	680 N.Y.S.2d 808
1962	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	West	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(G) EVIDENCE:::117k74 Weight and sufficiency of evidence}	980 S.W.2d 4
1953	Numed Inc.	Southwest	Monroe v. Numed Inc.	Monroe	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{117 DEATH:::117III(H) DAMAGES OR COMPENSATION:::117k80 Elements of compensation}	680 N.Y.S.2d 707
1965	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	South	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(H) DAMAGES OR COMPENSATION:::117k101 Apportionment and distribution of amount recovered}	980 S.W.2d 4
1953	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Northwest	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(I) TRIAL:::117k103 Questions for jury}	980 S.W.2d 4
1965	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	South	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(I) TRIAL:::117k104 Instructions}	980 S.W.2d 4
1948	Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	West	Linton v. Missouri Highway and Transp. Com'n	Linton	Mo.App. E.D.	{117 DEATH:::117III(K) REVIEW:::117k108 In general}	980 S.W.2d 4
1952	State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.	East	Hull v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.	Hull	Wis.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AI(A) IN GENERAL:::118Ak5 Discretion of court}	586 N.W.2d 863
1948	Metro Courier Corp.	Southwest	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Metro Courier Corp.	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.	Ga.App.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AI(D) ACTUAL OR JUSTICIABLE CONTROVERSY:::118Ak66 Advisory opinions}	507 S.E.2d 525
1953	Metro Courier Corp.	South	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Metro Courier Corp.	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.	Ga.App.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AI(D) ACTUAL OR JUSTICIABLE CONTROVERSY:::118Ak68 Future or contingent questions}	507 S.E.2d 525
1945	Metro Courier Corp.	South	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Metro Courier Corp.	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.	Ga.App.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AII(G)2 INSURANCE:::118Ak166 Automobile liability insurance}	507 S.E.2d 525
1962	Arkansas Game & Fish Com'n	North	Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Com'n	Ford	Ark.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AII(K) PUBLIC OFFICERS AND AGENCIES:::118Ak204 State officers and boards}	979 S.W.2d 897
1947	New York City Taxi and Limousine Com'n	South	United Car & Limousine Foundation, Inc. v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Com'n	United Car & Limousine Foundation, Inc.	N.Y.Sup.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(C) PARTIES:::118Ak299 Proper parties}	680 N.Y.S.2d 815
1948	New York City Taxi and Limousine Com'n	North	United Car & Limousine Foundation, Inc. v. New York City Taxi and Limousine Com'n	United Car & Limousine Foundation, Inc.	N.Y.Sup.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(D) PLEADING:::118Ak326 Motions in general}	680 N.Y.S.2d 815
1951	Metro Courier Corp.	Northeast	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Metro Courier Corp.	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.	Ga.App.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(F) HEARING AND DETERMINATION:::118Ak361 Dismissal before hearing}	507 S.E.2d 525
1951	Metro Courier Corp.	East	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Metro Courier Corp.	Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.	Ga.App.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(F) HEARING AND DETERMINATION:::118Ak361 Dismissal before hearing}	507 S.E.2d 525
1962	Pendrey	Southwest	Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pendrey	Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.	Ohio App. 6 Dist.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(F) HEARING AND DETERMINATION:::118Ak369 Verdict and findings}	703 N.E.2d 334
1952	City of Yonkers	South	Vitiello v. City of Yonkers	Vitiello	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(H) APPEAL AND ERROR:::118Ak392 Appeal and error}	680 N.Y.S.2d 607
1952	Pendrey	South	Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pendrey	Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.	Ohio App. 6 Dist.	{118A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT:::118AIII(H) APPEAL AND ERROR:::118Ak392 Appeal and error}	703 N.E.2d 334
1945	DEFENDANT	Northeast	In re Smith	PLAINTIFF	Wash.App. Div. 3	{120 DEEDS:::120I(D) DELIVERY:::120k54 Necessity}	968 P.2d 904
1965	DEFENDANT	South	In re 1650 Cases of Seized Liquor	PLAINTIFF	Vt.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k1 Nature and scope as punishment:::}	721 A.2d 100
1948	Real Property Known as 18328 11th Ave. N.E.	West	Bruett v. Real Property Known as 18328 11th Ave. N.E.	Bruett	Wash.App. Div. 1	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k2 Constitutional and statutory provisions:::}	968 P.2d 913
1952	State ex rel. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics	East	One (1) 1979 Ford 15V, Vin No. E14HBEE7506 v. State ex rel. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics	One (1) 1979 Ford 15V, Vin No. E14HBEE7506	Miss.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k3 Property subject to forfeiture:::}	721 So.2d 631
1948	State ex rel. Moore	Southwest	One (1) Charter Arms, Bulldog 44 Special, Serial No. 794774 v. State ex rel. Moore	One (1) Charter Arms, Bulldog 44 Special, Serial No. 794774	Miss.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k3 Property subject to forfeiture:::}	721 So.2d 620
1953	State	South	Bell v. State	Bell	Ga.App.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k5 Proceedings for enforcement:::}	507 S.E.2d 535
1945	State	South	Morris v. State	Morris	Ga.App.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k5 Proceedings for enforcement:::}	507 S.E.2d 532
1962	Miller	North	State v. Miller	State	Ga.App.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k5 Proceedings for enforcement:::}	507 S.E.2d 521
1947	DEFENDANT	South	In re 1650 Cases of Seized Liquor	PLAINTIFF	Vt.	{180 FORFEITURES:::180k5 Proceedings for enforcement:::}	721 A.2d 100
1948	Com.	North	Lee v. Com.	Lee	Va.App.	{181 FORGERY:::181k44 Weight and sufficiency of evidence:::}	507 S.E.2d 629
1951	McNamara	Northeast	Gouge v. McNamara	Gouge	Iowa App.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k2 Elements of actual fraud}	586 N.W.2d 710
1951	DeBrota	East	Huntington Mortg. Co. v. DeBrota	Huntington Mortg. Co.	Ind.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k5 Elements of constructive fraud}	703 N.E.2d 160
1962	Sandor	Southwest	Wilmoth v. Sandor	Wilmoth	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k8 Fraudulent representations}	680 N.Y.S.2d 542
1952	Smith	South	Spitale v. Smith	Spitale	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k15 Fraudulent concealment}	721 So.2d 341
1952	DeBrota	South	Huntington Mortg. Co. v. DeBrota	Huntington Mortg. Co.	Ind.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k15 Fraudulent concealment}	703 N.E.2d 160
1945	McNamara	Northeast	Gouge v. McNamara	Gouge	Iowa App.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k15 Fraudulent concealment}	586 N.W.2d 710
1950	Chaprell Jeep-Eagle Dodge, Inc.	North	France v. Chaprell Jeep-Eagle Dodge, Inc.	France	Okl.Civ.App. Div. 3	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k15 Fraudulent concealment}	968 P.2d 844
1948	Chaprell Jeep-Eagle Dodge, Inc.	North	France v. Chaprell Jeep-Eagle Dodge, Inc.	France	Okl.Civ.App. Div. 3	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k15 Fraudulent concealment}	968 P.2d 844
1965	Smith	West	Spitale v. Smith	Spitale	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k18 Materiality of matter represented or concealed}	721 So.2d 341
1952	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	South	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k19 Reliance on representations and inducement to act}	586 N.W.2d 797
1946	Rockwell Intern. Corp.	East	Daily News, L.P. v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.	Daily News, L.P.	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k19 Reliance on representations and inducement to act}	680 N.Y.S.2d 510
1960	Schonberger	Northeast	King David Associates v. Schonberger	King David Associates	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k19 Reliance on representations and inducement to act}	680 N.Y.S.2d 581
1945	Saibaba Corp.	North	Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.	Woodhull Corp.	Ga.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k25 Injury from fraud}	507 S.E.2d 493
1945	Lutton	Southwest	Kandros v. Lutton	Kandros	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{184 FRAUD:::184I DECEPTION CONSTITUTING FRAUD, AND LIABILITY THEREFOR:::184k27 Fraudulent representations or concealment as to particular facts}	680 N.Y.S.2d 522
1960	Sider	South	Congero v. Sider	Congero	N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.	{184 FRAUD:::184II(A) RIGHTS OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::184k31 Nature and form of remedy}	680 N.Y.S.2d 563
1953	Saibaba Corp.	Southwest	Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.	Woodhull Corp.	Ga.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184II(A) RIGHTS OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::184k32 Effect of existence of remedy by action on contract}	507 S.E.2d 493
1948	Rockwell Intern. Corp.	East	Daily News, L.P. v. Rockwell Intern. Corp.	Daily News, L.P.	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{184 FRAUD:::184II(A) RIGHTS OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::184k32 Effect of existence of remedy by action on contract}	680 N.Y.S.2d 510
1947	Saibaba Corp.	West	Woodhull Corp. v. Saibaba Corp.	Woodhull Corp.	Ga.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184II(A) RIGHTS OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::184k36 Defenses}	507 S.E.2d 493
1960	Guardian Alarm Co. of Michigan	Southwest	Travelers Ins. Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co. of Michigan	Travelers Ins. Co.	Mich.App.	{184 FRAUD:::184II(A) RIGHTS OF ACTION AND DEFENSES:::184k38 Time to sue and limitations}	586 N.W.2d 760
1954	Smith	Northwest	Spitale v. Smith	Spitale	Fla.App. 2 Dist.	{184 FRAUD:::184II(D) EVIDENCE:::184k58 Weight and sufficiency}	721 So.2d 341
1951	Dollar	Northwest	U.S. v. Dollar	U.S.	N.D.Ala.	{184 FRAUD:::184III CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY:::184k68.10 Fraud on government}	25 F.Supp.2d 1320
1945	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Northwest	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185VIII REQUISITES AND SUFFICIENCY OF WRITING:::185k103 Nature and form of memorandum in general}	586 N.W.2d 797
1962	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	West	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185VIII REQUISITES AND SUFFICIENCY OF WRITING:::185k105 Contents of memorandum}	586 N.W.2d 797
1948	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	East	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185VIII REQUISITES AND SUFFICIENCY OF WRITING:::185k105 Contents of memorandum}	586 N.W.2d 797
1945	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	North	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185VIII REQUISITES AND SUFFICIENCY OF WRITING:::185k114 Signature of memorandum}	586 N.W.2d 797
1945	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Northeast	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185VIII REQUISITES AND SUFFICIENCY OF WRITING:::185k114 Signature of memorandum}	586 N.W.2d 797
1954	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Northwest	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185VIII REQUISITES AND SUFFICIENCY OF WRITING:::185k118 Separate writings}	586 N.W.2d 797
1962	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	West	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185IX OPERATION AND EFFECT OF STATUTE:::185k119 Operation as to rights or remedies in general}	586 N.W.2d 797
1953	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Southwest	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185IX OPERATION AND EFFECT OF STATUTE:::185k125 Validity and enforcement of contracts in general}	586 N.W.2d 797
1965	General Mills, Inc.	South	Smith v. General Mills, Inc.	Smith	Mont.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185IX OPERATION AND EFFECT OF STATUTE:::185k127 Writing subsequent to oral agreement}	968 P.2d 723
1953	Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Northwest	Simplex Supplies, Inc. v. Abhe & Svoboda, Inc.	Simplex Supplies, Inc.	Minn.App.	{185 FRAUDS, STATUTE OF:::185XIII TRIAL:::185k159 Questions for jury}	586 N.W.2d 797
1965	Antoine Nat. Bank	South	Fitzgerald v. Antoine Nat. Bank	Fitzgerald	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{186 FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES:::186I(C) PROPERTY AND RIGHTS TRANSFERRED:::186k52 Homestead}	980 S.W.2d 228
1948	Antoine Nat. Bank	West	Fitzgerald v. Antoine Nat. Bank	Fitzgerald	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{186 FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES:::186II(A) ORIGINAL PARTIES:::186k180 Rights and liabilities of grantees as to creditors}	980 S.W.2d 228
1952	Reles	East	Washington 1993 Inc. v. Reles	Washington 1993 Inc.	N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.	{186 FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES:::186III(A) PERSONS ENTITLED TO ASSERT INVALIDITY:::186k212 Nature of claims of creditors}	680 N.Y.S.2d 715
1948	Antoine Nat. Bank	Southwest	Fitzgerald v. Antoine Nat. Bank	Fitzgerald	Tex.App.–Houston [14 Dist.]	{186 FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES:::186III(A) PERSONS ENTITLED TO ASSERT INVALIDITY:::186k219 General creditors}	980 S.W.2d 228
1953	State ex rel. Mississippi Dept. of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks	South	One 1992 Toyota 4-Runner, Vin No. JT3VN39W2N8034941 v. State ex rel. Mississippi Dept. of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks	One 1992 Toyota 4-Runner, Vin No. JT3VN39W2N8034941	Miss.	{187 GAME:::187k10 Searches and seizures:::}	721 So.2d 609
1945	Nejad	South	Raji v. Nejad	Raji	N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.	{191 GIFTS:::191I INTER VIVOS:::191k34 Qualified or conditional gifts}	680 N.Y.S.2d 520
1962	Moncus	North	Argo v. Moncus	Argo	Ala.Civ.App.	{191 GIFTS:::191I INTER VIVOS:::191k35 Validity}	721 So.2d 218
1947	Bright	South	Heineman v. Bright	Heineman	Md.App.	{191 GIFTS:::191I INTER VIVOS:::191k46 Evidence}	720 A.2d 1182
1948	Trammel	North	People v. Trammel	People	N.Y.Co.Ct.	{193 GRAND JURY:::193k35 Presence of accused or counsel:::}	680 N.Y.S.2d 828
1951	Anderson	Northeast	Brooksbank v. Anderson	Brooksbank	Minn.App.	{195 GUARANTY:::195I REQUISITES AND VALIDITY:::195k13 Consideration}	586 N.W.2d 789
1951	Anderson	East	Brooksbank v. Anderson	Brooksbank	Minn.App.	{195 GUARANTY:::195I REQUISITES AND VALIDITY:::195k13 Consideration}	586 N.W.2d 789
1962	Anderson	Southwest	Brooksbank v. Anderson	Brooksbank	Minn.App.	{195 GUARANTY:::195I REQUISITES AND VALIDITY:::195k13 Consideration}	586 N.W.2d 789
1952	Anderson	South	Brooksbank v. Anderson	Brooksbank	Minn.App.	{195 GUARANTY:::195I REQUISITES AND VALIDITY:::195k13 Consideration}	586 N.W.2d 789
1952	DEFENDANT	South	In re Yuridia G.	PLAINTIFF	Cal.App. 4 Dist.	{196 GUARDIAN AND WARD:::196I GUARDIANSHIP IN GENERAL:::196k3 What law governs}	80 Cal.Rptr.2d 921
1945	Thompson	Northeast	Turner v. Thompson	Turner	Or.App.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197I(A)2 NECESSITY AND EFFECT OF WRIT;  MOOTNESS AND PREMATURITY:::197k223 Particular issues and problems}	968 P.2d 858
1950	Huffman	North	Thomas v. Huffman	Thomas	Ohio	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197I(C) EXISTENCE AND EXHAUSTION OF OTHER REMEDIES:::197k285 Post-conviction motions or proceedings}	703 N.E.2d 315
1948	Huffman	North	Thomas v. Huffman	Thomas	Ohio	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197I(C) EXISTENCE AND EXHAUSTION OF OTHER REMEDIES:::197k290 Appeal, error, or other direct review of conviction}	703 N.E.2d 315
1965	State	West	McKay v. State	McKay	Ga.App.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197II(B) PARTICULAR DEFECTS AND AUTHORITY FOR DETENTION IN GENERAL:::197k474 Indictment, information, affidavit, or complaint}	507 S.E.2d 484
1952	DEFENDANT	South	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197III(C)2 EVIDENCE:::197k705 Burden of proof}	968 P.2d 476
1946	DEFENDANT	East	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197III(C)2 EVIDENCE:::197k712 Admissibility}	968 P.2d 476
1960	DEFENDANT	Northeast	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197III(C)2 EVIDENCE:::197k715 Criminal proceedings, weight and sufficiency}	968 P.2d 476
1945	DEFENDANT	North	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197III(C)3 HEARING:::197k742 Discretion and necessity in general}	968 P.2d 476
1945	DEFENDANT	Southwest	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197III(C)4 CONCLUSIVENESS OF PRIOR DETERMINATIONS:::197k764 Matters determined on appeal}	968 P.2d 476
1960	DEFENDANT	South	In re Gay	PLAINTIFF	Cal.	{197 HABEAS CORPUS:::197III(C)5 DETERMINATION AND DISPOSITION;  RELIEF:::197k792 Conditional relief;  new trial or other proceeding}	968 P.2d 476