What about U7 and the others? Is this a typo or do some definitions in
the model need to change to rule this out? (I am trying to figure out if
I should dive into the current definition of the model or wait if there
are changes coming.)
Bill Pugh wrote:
> The unified proposal said in the caption for U6 that U6 was allowed by
> the new model.
>
> U6 is _not_ allowed by the new model, as was stated elsewhere in the
> document.
>
> I've updated the document on the web page.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:59 EDT