|
Project Manager
|
IMPORTANT: As part of this project, you will be expected to use buggy 3rd-party software. This is done deliberately to simulate real-life scenarios. Students are expected to work around the bugs and submit their projects on time.
The project manager (marked in red below) will be a member of one group.
|
Team |
Group type |
STUDENT NAME |
|---|---|---|
|
Team 1: TerpCalc Graph Calculator with Filing capability & User-defined Functions |
Testing |
Atamas, Nicholas |
| Abbas, Sumair | ||
| Nguyen, Thanh Dang | ||
|
Coding |
Lin, Michael Y | |
| Rozi, Faraz | ||
| Rho, Yong Doo | ||
Team 2: TerpWord Word Processor with Graph/image display capability |
Testing |
Kang, Kenneth |
| Zuckerman, Jay | ||
| Ibrahim, Ahmad Hassan | ||
| Padencov, Serban Nicolae | ||
|
Coding |
Miller, Kenneth Todd | |
| Wolfe, Mark Alan | ||
| Mansoor, Muhammad Salman | ||
|
Team 3: TerpSpreadsheet Spreadsheet program with User-defined Functions |
Testing |
Dharia, Harshal Jayesh |
| Tahan, Jonathan David | ||
| Wheeler, Scott Philip | ||
|
Coding |
Kim, Tae Hoon | |
| Chow, Daniel Kenneth | ||
| Thaler, Evan Scott | ||
| Ma, Xiao | ||
|
Team 4: TerpPaint Paint Program |
Testing |
Tamizi, Matin |
| Ziskind, David Ryan | ||
| Rabinovich, Svetlana | ||
|
Coding |
Wissmann, Robert William | |
| Cheng, Mo | ||
| Tao, Shih-Chieh | ||
Team 5: TerpPresent Object-based drawing and Presentation Tool |
Testing |
Zhu, Tommy M |
| Wong, Eric Tak Wai | ||
| Kim, Sun Ki | ||
| Lowe, Walter Payne | ||
|
Coding |
Ryan, Joseph Francis | |
| Rash, Kathryn R | ||
| Ellison, Jason Jeffrey | ||
|
Team 6: TerpManager An Explorer |
Testing |
Ambikapathi, Girija |
| Garrett, Lindsey Anne | ||
| Lee, Hana | ||
|
Coding |
Lee, Joseph Hansung | |
| Axelrod, Adam Marc |
You need to schedule meetings with me so that I can give you an initial set of informal requirements for your assigned software product.
Starting from the informal requirements, you will develop a complete set of requirements, design a system that meets these requirements, and finally create and test a software system that implements your design. At each step in this process you will produce corresponding documentation. All documents must be submitted in electronic format and must be written in English. You must also submit an evaluation of yourself and each of your team-mates at each of these stages.
| # |
Group |
Phase |
Due Date |
||||||||||
| 1 | Testing | Summary: GUITAR Tests & Update bug-reports for Version
3.0
Deliverables
Successful/unsuccessful log files (automatically generated by GUITAR). Printout of your Bug reports from Bugzilla (Bug reports should have description of Bug and the test case attachment that was used to detect it) |
Feb. 22 | ||||||||||
| 2 | Coding | Summary: JavaDoc Files Creation, Unit Test Cases & Update bug-reports for
Version 3.0
Deliverables
|
Feb. 22 | ||||||||||
| 3 | Testing & Coding | Summary: Requirement Analysis Document
Deliverables
|
Mar. 7 | ||||||||||
| 4 | Testing | Summary: Design Document
Deliverables
GRADING POLICY: This submission is worth 100 points. You are expected to submit valid LaTeX source files with 100 scenarios. The initial and final software states should be described using captured screenshots accompanied by text fully describing the state in detail. If any environment settings, such as variables and files are needed in the state description, please describe them in detail. The event sequence should be described in as much detail as possible. A software user should be able to use these scenarios to bring the software to the described initial state, execute the event sequence steps, and recreate the final state without any additional help. Please provide a file called "toplevel.tex" that compiles to the final document. The grader will compile the files using the command "pdflatex toplevel". If the LaTeX source files are not compliable, then you will lose all points for this submission. The grader will then execute the 100 scenarios on three platforms -- Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Linux. For each scenario that runs successfully on all three platforms, you get 1 point. No partial points will be given if results vary by platform. |
Apr. 4 | ||||||||||
| 5 | Coding | Summary: Complete Working Software Code
(Version 4.0)
Deliverables
GRADING POLICY: This submission is worth 300 points. The source code submission should include only SOURCE files. Code archives (e.g., .jar) should not be submitted. The build scripts should be able to install the software on a new computer, which has only the OS installed. The grader will first delete all archives and derived files (e.g., .jar, .exe, .class files) from your submission; if any are found, you will lose 100 points. The grader will then read your README file (a plain-text file) and use it to build your application. The build script should return a meaningful error and instructions if additional system software (such as a compiler) needs to be installed. If the script does not return a meaningful message, then the grader will abandon the installation; you will lose all points for this submission. You are not allowed to require the installation of any third-party tools and/or libraries. A successful build is not worth any points. The grader will repeat this process on three platforms -- Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Linux. The final message from the build script (after a successful build) should give detailed instructions on how to execute your application. An "execute script" should be generated/provided that automatically executes the application. Without this script, the grader will not run your application. The grader will then execute 100 scenarios (not necessarily the ones that you submit) taken directly from the requirements that were given by the customer. Each successful scenario per platform is worth 1 point. |
Apr. 4 | ||||||||||
| 6 | Testing | Summary: Test
cases & Update bug-reports for
Version 4.0
Deliverables (Choose 300 methods in the code for this phase)
GRADING POLICY:
|
Apr. 21 | ||||||||||
| 7 | Coding | Summary: JavaDoc Files Creation, Unit Test Cases &
getIcon() for
Version 4.0
Deliverables (Use the same (as above) 300 methods in the code for this phase)
GRADING POLICY:
|
Apr. 21 | ||||||||||
| 8 | Testing | Summary: User Manuals
(User Guide) and update Web-site for
Version 4.0 GRADING POLICY: WEB-SITE: [This submission is worth 200 points; bonus points will be given for creativity] The web-site should be submitted on a CD. It should have only one root folder at the top-level, called any one of: TerpManager, TerpWord, TerpPaint, TerpSpreadSheet, TerpCalc, TerpPresent. I will copy the root folder to the www.cs.umd.edu web server. Please don't hardcode any links, i.e., all links should be relative to your root folder. Also, don't make any assumptions about the web-server (Note that cgi and other server scripts are not allowed; directory browsing is also not allowed). The root folder should contain a file called index.html that points to the "first page" (or Home) of your site. The contents of your entire site should be accessible (directly or indirectly) from this page. Provide at least the following pages: (1) "About Us" that lists your names, (2) "Contact Us" that points to your Terp????@cs.umd.edu contact e-mail address, (3) "Report a Bug" that points to all bugs related to your version of Terp???? on bugs.cs.umd.edu (yes, if you have reported bugs elsewhere, please migrate them to bugs.cs.umd.edu), (4) "FAQs" that contain answers to some commonly asked questions about your software/installer/developers; you may get some questions from the TA or your instructor, (5) "Install" that provides instructions (and a link to an archive containing only SOURCE files and install scripts) on how to install your application, (6) "Site Map" that shows the structure of your site as a tree, and (7) "Downloads" that allows users to download any (or all) document(s) and code submitted during this semester; provide mechanisms to let the user first select the needed files and then download them using one button-click. Each page should contain links to all these pages and Home. (Feel free to get feedback on partially created web-sites before the submission date. I strongly encourage that all groups work together to produce the web-sites; also, it would be nice to have one TerpOffice Version 4.0 page that links to all Terp???? applications in version 4.0) USER-MANUAL: [This submission is worth 100 points; bonus points will be given for creativity] Submit ONE pdf file that is the user guide, and all the source files. The sources should produce one document identical to the submitted pdf file. The user guide should contain the following sections: Cover page, Table of contents, Introduction (overview of the software, platform restrictions, etc.), Installation guide, Working with Terp???? (features of your software, How-to use-cases submitted in an earlier phase). In addition, some of you will submit a UML document that will be called the "Design Document". Please keep in mind that students will edit this document next year; if necessary, please provide links to (free) software that can be used to edit your files. Please don't use any commercial software. |
May 09 | ||||||||||
| 9 | Coding | Summary: Debugged Final Deliverable (one-click installable) Code for
Version 4.0 GRADING POLICY: This submission is worth 300 points. The grader will use the "Install" page of your web-site to download and build your application. If the download/build script/process fails, then the grader will abandon the installation; you will lose all points for this submission. You are not allowed to require the installation of any third-party tools and/or libraries. A successful build is not worth any points. The grader will repeat this process on three client platforms -- Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Linux. The final message from the build script (after a successful build) should give detailed instructions on how to execute your application. An "execute script" should be generated/provided that automatically executes the application. Without this script, the grader will not run your application. The grader will then execute 100 scenarios (not necessarily the ones that
you submit) taken directly from the requirements that were given by the
customer. Each successful scenario per platform is worth 1 point. Note that
several scenarios may fail due to one underlying bug; you will lose points
for each failed scenario. |
May 09 |
The university computer labs should provide all necessary support for the project. Other resources normally available to you (e.g., home computers) can be employed, however you do this is "at your own risk." No alterations to conditions of the assignment will be made to accommodate peculiarities of your other computing resources.
All teams will present their project in class. Details of the presentation are available here. An evaluation sheet will need to be filled by every student.
Late deliverables will be accepted with a 10% penalty per day. Start your projects early - last-minute computer malfunctions will not be accepted as reason for delaying an assignment's due date.
Copyright: Dept. of Computer Science, University of Maryland.
|