| 1. This year's review form had four nonstandard fields intended to express the components of the merit judgment. Overall, how did the presence of these fields affect your reviewing experience? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 43 | ||
| skipped question | 0 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| I found them very useful | 11.6% | 5 | |
| I found them somewhat useful | 30.2% | 13 | |
| DIdn't matter to me one way or another | 32.6% | 14 | |
| I viewed them somewhat negatively | 20.9% | 9 | |
| I viewed them very negatively | 4.7% | 2 | |
| Further comment | 14 | ||
| 2. If you had to design your own review form, which fields would you have? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 41 | ||
| skipped question | 2 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Overall merit | 100.0% | 41 | |
| Expertise | 73.2% | 30 | |
| Confidence in merit score | 58.5% | 24 | |
| Quirkiness | 4.9% | 2 | |
| Clarity | 46.3% | 19 | |
| Conviction (convincingness of evidence) | 41.5% | 17 | |
| Novelty | 39.0% | 16 | |
| Importance | 39.0% | 16 | |
| Other (list below) | 4.9% | 2 | |
| Other (please specify) | 6 | ||