In re. Dan Scales, Sanjay Ghemawat and Raymie Stata's carefully
thought-out proposal, whether or not one thinks the lazy initialization
idioms are reasonable, it still strikes me as a *very* bad idea to permit
compromised Strings to float around. I strongly suspect -- In fact I
know -- that there are modules whose security is compromised if Strings
"behave badly." To me, this suggests that we may have no choice but to
solve the "initialization safety problem."
P.S. I realize that we pretty much agreed not to discuss this anymore, and
I do not want to start a flame-fest. Sorry if anyone considers this mail
out of line but I just want to remind people that "String-safety" may
eventually be decreed an absolute requirement by the powers that be.
This is the JavaMemoryModel mailing list, managed by Majordomo 1.94.4.
To send a message to the list, email JavaMemoryModel@cs.umd.edu
To send a request to the list, email firstname.lastname@example.org and put
your request in the body of the message (use the request "help" for help).
For more information, visit http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:16 EDT