Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought

From: Bill Pugh (pugh@cs.umd.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 08 1999 - 18:57:20 EST

Next message: David Holmes: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses"
Previous message: Adalberto Castelo: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought"
In reply to: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Sorry if anyone got confused. I had the test backwards. It should be if (v==0):

int v;
int getValue() {
   if (v == 0)
     v = computeValue();
   return v;
   }
-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel

Next message: David Holmes: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses"
Previous message: Adalberto Castelo: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought"
In reply to: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:21 EDT