Re: JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization in the spec benchmarks

From: Joshua Bloch (jbloch@eng.sun.com)
Date: Tue Nov 09 1999 - 22:18:21 EST

Next message: Joshua Bloch: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model"
Previous message: Adalberto Castelo: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated thanwe thought"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization in the spec benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I find it pretty depressing that at the top of *each* list is something
that never should have been synchronized in the first place: Vector,
InputStream, Hashtable (arguable), StringBuffer. Sigh...

Josh

Next message: Joshua Bloch: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model"
Previous message: Adalberto Castelo: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated thanwe thought"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization in the spec benchmarks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:22 EDT