Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile

From: Doug Lea (dl@cs.oswego.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2000 - 12:26:51 EST

Next message: Doug Lea: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes"
Previous message: Bill Pugh: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes"
In reply to: Bill Pugh: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile"
Next in thread: Tom May: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> This is essentially another variant of V4.
> ... (or V3)

Right. The main question becomes: Is there any good argument for
requiring V6?

-Doug

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel

Next message: Doug Lea: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes"
Previous message: Bill Pugh: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes"
In reply to: Bill Pugh: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile"
Next in thread: Tom May: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:25 EDT