RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts

From: David Holmes (
Date: Mon May 26 2003 - 18:49:12 EDT

Bill Pugh wrote:
> the renotification rule
> isn't trivial, but it ensures that many design patterns for using
> notify() work, without requiring explicit calls by the
> programmer to notify in all of the catch blocks for IE.

I think the point is that there should be no need for the
renotification rule: neither by the JVM nor the programmer.

David Holmes

JavaMemoryModel mailing list -

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:45 EDT