Re: JavaMemoryModel: Wait/notify semantics

From: Sylvia Else (
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 16:02:51 EST

At 03:21 PM 19/01/2004 -0500, Bill Pugh wrote:

>Any objections?

A formal objection, only, I suppose.

I object to the spurious interrupts, on the grounds that they are not
necessary, represent a change to the originally published specification
(whatever the writers might have intended at the time), and set the bad
precedent of fixing broken VMs by changing the specification.


JavaMemoryModel mailing list -

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:56 EDT