CMSC 250 Fall 2004 -- Homework 9 Answer
Due Wed., Nov. 3 at the beginning of your discussion section.
You must write the solutions to the problems single-sided on your own lined paper, with all sheets stapled together, and with all answers written in sequential order or you will lose points.
Denote
the complement of
and
the power set of
.
- Find
and
.
ANSWER:
,
- Prove or disprove the followings:
- For all sets
and
,
.
ANSWER:
Show:
Proof:
Let A and B be arbitrary sets.
Let x be arbitrary in U.
Assume
by deff of union
Case 1:
by def of set diff.
by conjunctive simplification
Case 2:
by conjunctive simplification
Therefore by dilemma
by CCW
by gen from GP
Therefore,
by def of subset
- For all sets
and
, if
then
.
ANSWER:
Proof:
Let A and B be arbitrary sets.
Assume
Let x be arbitrary in the U
Assume
Assume
by def of set comp.
by def of subset
conj add
This is a contradition
Assume
by CCW
by CCW
by gen from GP
by def of subset
by CCW
by gen from GP
OR
Let A and B be arbitrary Sets.
Assume
, which means
by def of subset.
The contrapositive is:
.
That means
by def of set comp.
which means
by def of subset
by CCW
Therefore,
by generalizing from the GP.
- For all sets
,
and
,
.
Show:
Proof:
Let A, B and C be arbitrary Sets.
Let
be arbitrary in U.
Assume
.
by def of Cartesian Product.
by def of intersection.
by comm, assoc and idempotent
by def of Cartesian Product.
by def of intersection
by CCW.
by gen from GP.
by def of subset.
AND
show:
proof:
Let A, B and C be arbitrary Sets.
Let
be arbitrary in U.
Assume
by def of intersect
by def of cartesian product
by comm, assoc and idempotent
by def of intersection
by def of cartesian product.
by CCW
by gen from GP
by def of subset
Since from part 1 we know
and from part 2 we know
We know that
by definition of set equality.
- For all sets
,
and
, if
then
.
Let A, B and C be arbitrary sets.
Assume
Assume
by def of non-empty set
by def of intersect
by def of set diff.
by conj simplification.
by def of intersection
by def of subset
by conjunctive simplification
This is a contradiction since m can't be both in A and not in A
by CCW
by CCW
by gen from GP
QED
- For all sets
,
and
,
.
Counterexample:
,
and
.
- For all sets
and
,
.
Show:
.
proof:
let x be arbitrary in U.
Assume
by def of powerset.
and
by def of intersection
and
by def of powerset
by def of intersection
by CCW
by gen from GP.
by def of subset.
Show:
.
Proof:
Let x be arbitrary in U.
Assume
by def of intersection
by def of powerset
Let g be arbitrary in U
Assume
.
by def of subset
by def of subset
by conj add
by def of intersect
by CCW
by gen from GP
by def of subset
by def of powerset
by CCW
by gen from GP
by def of subset
Since
and
we have
by def of set equality.
- Prove, by induction:
- If
for all
, then
.
Answer:
Lemma 1:
and
implies
.
Proof:
and
and
and
.
Show: If
for all
, then
.
Proof: by induction on
.
Base (
): If
and
then
by lemme 1 above
Induction hypothesis (
):
If
for all
, then
Induction step (
):
Show: If
for all
, then
Proof:
for all
for all
and
and
(By IH)
(by lemma 1 above)
- If
for all
, then
.
Answer:
Lemma 2:
and
implies
.
Proof:
and
and
by def of subset
and
by by contrapositive and distributive
by def of intersection
by contrapositive
by DeMorgan's
by def of subset
Show: If
for all
, then
.
Proof: by induction on
.
Base (
): If
and
then
by Lemma 2 above
Induction hypothesis (
):
If
for all
, then
.
Induction step (
):
Show: If
for all
, then
.
Proof:
for all
for all
and
and
(by IH)
(by Lemma 2 above
Kin-Keung Ma
2004-11-09
Web Accessibility