| Name (PRINTED): |
|
| Student ID #: |
|
| Section # (or TA's: |
|
| name and time) |
|
|
CMSC 250 |
Quiz #9 ANSWERS |
Wed., Oct. 27, 2004 |
|
Write all answers legibly in the space provided. The number of points
possible for each question is indicated in square brackets - the total
number of points on the quiz is 30, and you will have exactly 20 minutes
to complete this quiz. You may not use calculators, textbooks or any other
aids during this quiz.
- [15 pnts.]Use regular induction to prove the following inequality.
Base Case: (n=2)
LHS:
RHS:
so the statement is true when
Inductive Hypothesis:(n=x)
Inductive Step:(n=x+1)
show:
proof:
PART 1 (find b):
by the IH
by adding the same summation to both sides
by combining and expanding the summation
by squaring the polynomial
by combining like terms
Let
PART 2 (show that
in other words that
)
Assume
by putting things over a common denominator and cubing the polynomial
by splitting up the fraction
by subtracting the same quantity from both sides
This is a contradiction,
so our assumption must be false and we know for sure then that
by closing the conditional world
We know from part 1 that
Therefore by the transitive property of inequalities, we know
QED
OR AN ALTERNATIVE PROOF PORTION:
proof:
by the IH
by LEMMA #1 proved below
by adding inequalities
by combining summations and putting terms over a common demoninator
by factorring the polynomial
QED
----------------
LEMMA #1
This lemma needs to prove that
Assume
by expanding the summation
by squaring the polynomial
by combining like terms
by subtracting
from both sides
This is a contradiction because
is clearly non-negative.
Since we have reached a contradiction, we know our assumption must be false.
Therefore
by closing the conditional world
- [15 pnts.] Use strong induction to prove the following statement.
Assume:
Prove that
Base Case: (n=0, n=1)
n=0:
and
n=1:
and
The formula holds for both base cases.
Inductive Hypothesis:(n=i
)
Inductive Step:(n=p)
show:
proof:
Since
and
because we are subtracting positive values on the smaller side
And since
and
,
We know we can apply the IH to both
and to
.
Doing this we get the facts that:
and
By substitution into the above equation using these we get
by combining factors of 3
by distributing out the 3 term
by multiplying through the 2
by combining like terms
by commutativity of multiplication
QED
Kin-Keung Ma
2004-10-28
Web Accessibility