Next: About this document ...
CMSC 250 Fall 2004 -- Homework 16
Due Never at the beginning of your discussion section.
You must write the solutions to the problems single-sided on your own lined paper, with all sheets stapled together, and with all answers written in sequential order or you will lose points.
- Let
and
be the relation on
defined as follows. Draw the directed graphs for
and
and indicate which relations are antisymmetric.
-
-
- Let
. Let
be a binary relation on
with the following pairs related:
,
,
,
. Write the following sets using ordered pair notation.
- The reflexive closure of
.
- The symmetric closure of
.
- The transitive closure of
.
- Redo number 3 representing each relation as a matrix.
- Redo number 3 representing each relation as a directed graph.
- Let
be a relation defined by
| 1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
| 0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| 1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| 0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Write the matrices representing the reflexive and symmetric closures of
. Is
asymmetric? Is
antisymmetric? Is
reflexive? Is
irreflexive? Give reasons for your answers.
- Let
. Let
be a binary relation defined on
defined by:
if
. Write the the relation using ordered pair notation, and show that the relation is antisymmetric.
- Using the subset inclusion partial order relation, give an example of two elements that are not comparable.
- Define a relation R on the set of all integers as follows:
is even.
Is R a partial order relation? Prove or give counterexample.
- Let
. Let
be the partial order relation defined by inclusion of subsets of
. Write a chain
of maximal length contained in
.
- Let
be a partial order relation on
given by:
Draw the Hasse diagram for
.
- In the following, the relation
is an equivalent relation on the set
.
Find the distinct equivalence classes of
.
and
.
is defined on
as follows:
For all sets
and
in
,
is the set of all strings of length 2 in 0's, 1's, and 2's.
is defined on
as follows:
For all strings
and
in
,
- Let
be the set of all points in the Cartesian plane except the origin.
is the relation defined as follows:
For all
and
in
,
Proof that the relation is and equivalence relation, and describe the distinct equivalence classes.
- Let
be a binary relation on a set
and suppose
is symmetric and transitive. Prove the following:
If for every
in
there is a
in
such that
, then
is an equivalence relation.
- For each of the following either prove that it is a partial order relation or indicate why it is not a partial order relation.
- Define a relation
on the set
of all integers as follows: For all
,
- Define a relation
on the set
of all real numbers as follows: For all
,
- Let
, and let
be the relation
Is
a total order on
? justify your answer.
Next: About this document ...
Chang Hu
2005-12-10
Web Accessibility