| Name (PRINTED): | |
| Student ID #: | |
| Section # (or TA's: | |
| name and time) |
| CMSC 250 | Quiz #10 ANSWERS | Wed., Apr. 5, 2006 |
FALSE
Disproof by counter example:
Let
Let
Let
and
because the empty set is a subset of every set.
Therefore the antecedent of the implication is true.
by def of set difference
by def on intersection
Therefore the consequent is false.
Since the antecedent is true and the consequent false, this is a valid counterexample.