RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Oops... Forgot non-atomic volatile write s

From: Hudson, Rick (rick.hudson@intel.com)
Date: Fri Dec 21 2001 - 09:46:19 EST


I will also note that the recently passed ECMA C#/CLR/CLI standard
does not require a single global ordering, so at least that
group has come to a different conclusion than what is proposed
in the paper.

- Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Lea [mailto:dl@altair.cs.oswego.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 5:00 PM
To: javamemorymodel@cs.umd.edu
Subject: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Oops... Forgot non-atomic volatile writes

> Comments?

I still think this is OK.

Ever since lack of total ordering came up a year or so ago, we've been
unable to come up with any realistic examples where this would make
any difference in how people program. Even the strained and
unrealistic examples (like the ones posted last summer (see archives
around 22july01)) are particularly strained and unrealistic.

-Doug

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:36 EDT