  jim o'rourke in typical morbid, cheeky style: "Women look good in, with mens clothes on / It contains them / Men look good in, with womens clothes on / It betrays them.
" (lyrics from modern rock's (or laptop rock) second best lyricist. which kind of sucks, but compare to linkin park in cy's ever eloquent ways: " urlLink challenging -- and beating -- the intelligence quotient of more than a million people a day. " and no, off-kilter grammar aside, i am saying nothing. ) needless to say, i lost to cy at scrabble, despite four eight letter words (and a 200-point windfall) in one game (i lost by an agonising one point). cy is just too good at this thing. she got MORIBUND and PHYSICAL out of nowhere in the last stages of that particular game. i got UPRIGHTS, ERECTION and WARHEAD in three consecutive turns, with three of the six Rs and hence destroying my chances of winning with a related word like ROBERT.
i rulez. it's like my fifa 2003 game: twenty shots on target, five shots that smacked the uprights (with a very, very detectable relish by my team's HOME crowd), and zero goals. shut up. my inspiration comes from monty python's eric idle's urlLink penis song . and no, don't ask why. just grin and bear with it. lessons as usual next week. which impedes with revision for my aptitude tests next saturday. and of course you don't need revision for aptitude tests because none of what you have learnt in the past 15 years will actually be tested.
but i actually have some articles on the greatest chess player (or at least, "a guy who won six amateurs simultaneously while blindfolded", i am not lying to you) paul morphy. but all geniuses are inherently assholes, like bobby fischer. now that's one big asshole. fischer: "i want a prompt, direct, specific, straightforward and unequivocal faxed answer to this question. " storage company: "the direct, specific, straightforward and unequivocal answer is no. " fischer (in reply): "instead of answering my clear, simple and extremely pertinent question you insist on falsely restating my question and then answering with your own false restatement! " (goes on to ask the earlier first question. this is posed in addition to about 3/4 page describing the contents of a previously faxed document. ) storage company: "the direct, specific, straightforward and unequivocal answer is no. " and so on. bye. 
