  WHAT KERRY'S "SERVICE" MEANS Nobody has proven veterans outperform nonveterans as Commanders-in-Chief. Jungle shooting is a warrior skill, not a management skill; correlating unrelated skills sets is wrong. Just because one's service evasion may demonstrate one lacks the honesty necessary to be President (the lying patterns in Clinton's evasion predicted his Presidency), service/nonservice does not predict policy leadership. Even if it did, Kerry is not a good enough veteran. He renounced his honors publicly in protest, probably also ashamed for going AWOL and shooting innocents; acts for which he vainly apologized. Hence neither Bush's minimalist service nor Kerry's bad service suggest that Kerry would have a better foreign policy. Kerry's perpetuation of this is delusion or deception. 
