  IRAN IS NOT MODERATING Just as little kids believe it the tooth ferry, liberal academics believe in Iranian moderates-- even though Clerics rule Iran, and have for decades, they point to an impotent President and a few lousy newspapers and glean a movement towards democracy. Such women and men will do anything to oppose a muscular American military and a muscular foreign policy. If you want to see the truth of Iran, go ahead and see Iran's contribution to the Internet: Go to the Islamic News Wire, go to the Tehran Times, go and you will see that the current youth of Iran is unlikely to progress as the last one, that in fact the mentality of the old Council of Guardians continues to prevail.
Ye believers in a moderating Iran, ye suckers, witness the journalism of the Tehran Times, considered the most progressive newspaper in town: "Zionists’ Golden Vote By Hassan Hanizadeh The presidential election campaign pitting Democratic Party candidate John Kerry against current U.S. President George W. Bush of the Republican Party has become more serious in recent days. The Democratic Party recently held its national convention in Boston and officially declared Kerry the party’s candidate for the November 2 U.S. presidential election. On domestic affairs, the platforms of the two candidates are almost diametrically opposed to each other. However, Kerry and Bush both pursue the same foreign policy. Increasing wages, personal liberty, which has been under attack during Bush’s presidency, and the rights of racial and religious minorities in the U.S. are some of the main issues of the Democrats. The campaign against terrorism, domestic and international security, increasing the military budget, and boosting the national economy are the priority issues on the Republican agenda. But both parties share a common stance on maintaining the security and regional military superiority of Israel. The Zionist lobby certainly plays a very significant role in defining U.S. foreign policy, since each of the country’s presidents over the past century owes his victory to the U.S. Zionists’ “golden votes”. The Zionist lobby’s domination of the U.S. media, the fact that 5000 U.S. newspapers and radio and television networks are pro-Zionist, and the Zionists’ $1.8 trillion investment in U.S. stock exchanges illustrates the Zionists’ ability to determine the outcome of U.S. elections.
This is why U.S. presidential candidates usually make written pledges to support the interests of the Zionist lobby if they win the election. Along these lines, Kerry recently sent his brother to the occupied territories to explain the Democratic position on Israel. The White House has also remained silent about Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian nation, and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has taken advantage of the situation to massacre more Palestinians.
Obviously, both parties are beholden to the Zionist lobby, and the Zionist regime will definitely try to gain concessions from both the Democrats and the Republicans during the election campaign. It is not the electoral choice of the majority of U.S. citizens but the “golden vote” of U.S. Zionists that guarantees victory for a presidential candidate.
" So much for the growing free press' contribution to the Internet! If you think this is an exception, go ahead and ruffle through more of their pathetic journalism, go and see the intellectual dishonesty incongruous with anything like a democratic generation. Go see that the Iranian youth is as out-of-control and filled with hate as the Palestinian youth, and we might as well wall them in too. The ugliness of the Islamic world is why we need a muscular foreign policy, not John Kerry's lame foreign policy. 
