  urlLink Giuliani: "They don't want the American people to know that the nominee for the Democratic Party [is] the senator in the U.S. Senate who had the single-most liberal voting record -- more liberal than Hillary Clinton, more liberal than Ted Kennedy". Also, later on... "Giuliani described Kerry, on the other hand, as a waffler, noting that the Massachusetts senator voted for an Iraq war resolution but against an $87-billion supplemental appropriation to support the war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan. " One thing: he can't be much of a waffler. That would mean that he's waffling within the leftist extreme of the Democratic Party, which, if I'm right, means that he's not waffling. You can't change your mind all the time and still be ideologically consistent. Maybe they're just talking about the war in Iraq and the vote in particular.
Well, this is from the same people that brought you the urlLink 350 tax increases or whatever . It's clear that they have either a severe logic problem or have no idea how the legislative process works.&nbsp;Imagine a bill that protected the elderly from shark attacks. (The Bush Administration would spin this one as 'Saving America's Water from Terrorists'). But the nut-job idealogues and their cohorts made the bill fund itself by charging the elderly who are attacked the balance of their life savings.
(Eliminating the moral hazard of indifference to shark-mauling. Armchair economists all, you see. New name: 'Protecting America's Freedom') I would damn well have voted for it, before the shock troopers on the other side of the aisle made it intolerable. Who would have thought that complex and nuanced legislative matters would require more than poly-repetitive slogans and artificial simplicity? 
