  In my opinion there is some merit to the theory that there quite frankly aren’t many single women here, period, and the older you get the worse it gets. There have been a lot of comments on the relative attractiveness of Seattle women versus those in other parts of the nation and world. Instead of fanning those flames I’ll simple say: assuming there are fewer women as a whole (and even census figures support this), it logically follows that there must likewise be a lower proportion of “attractive” women to choose from as compared to other cities. By the way, this in no way implies that there are a lot of attractive men in Seattle. Being a man myself, I could look at a lineup of ten guys who were a mix of different levels of “attractiveness” to women, and other than the fat guy, the bald guy and the guy with black bean teeth I’d have no idea which was which.
That said, I’ve seen enough to know that there are plenty of ugly guys in town. Plenty. So, in a nutshell, I believe that the main Seattle-specific “problem” is that there are simply not as many women as men, or at least I don’t know where they are. If there is some secret lair we don’t know about please do speak up. As the title of this post implies, I believe that the male/female ratio is the secondary problem. What, then, is the primary problem? 
