  So I was reading this article: urlLink https://www.gopusa.com/commentary/lchavez/2004/lc_0520.shtml (sorry, I don't know how to properly link yet, but have patience, I'M LEARNIN'!
) This Linda Chavez is an interesting woman. I suspect that I'll be having lots of fun with these people over at GOPUSA. Here's my comments that I posted to their website: I have one question for Ms. Linda Chavez regarding her article entitled "Media Downplays the Discovery of WMD in Iraq". First of all, let's look at what W.M.D. stands for. It stands for WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION. The first word is weapons. That's plural meaning more than one. How many were found? Answer: one.
The second word is mass. Mass implies large numbers as in masses, as in hundreds, shoot, I'll give her the benefit of the doubt, let's say three. How many masses were affected? Answer: 0. This brings the astute reader to the third word, destruction. How many masses or how much property was rendered dead or useless? Answer: 0. The weapon contained 3-4 litres of sarin.
I would like Ms. Chavez to answer the last question. During the 237 times that W and his administration, namely Colin Powell, Dick Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice and Dick Cheney lied to the American people and the world about WMDs, how much sarin did they say that Saddam Hussein's regime possessed? I'll give you a quarter for the right answer. I wait with baited breathe. I'll let you know what response, if any, I receive. 
