  urlLink This is weird . A FOX News report that actually criticizes Bush. Oh, wait... They're standing up for the tobacco companies. I guess that makes sense then. The proof consists of taking the hardest item to prove - second hand smoke is bad - and then spends the rest of the article discussing that.
With 4 instances as proof, the entire thing should just be dropped. Uh-huh. How convenient. We'll just ignore the rest of the suit and toss it out. Saves the tobacco company a ton of money: What's good for business must be good for everyone else. (Note: I am very biased against smoking.
For instance, my wife will be out of commission for the next day or so with any quantity of smoke. Stuffed up nose, headache, etc. It is very hard for me to believe that something that is known to be bad for the inhaler does not have some harmful effect on those around them. ) (Note #2: Plus the proof is too transparent. ) 
