  Over and over again, the Democrats keep insisting that our global leadership has faltered because of Bush and Iraq.&nbsp; They also insist, that they will work more closely with them (read, Germany and France since they're about the only non-Communist states against us . . . and the Islamofacist states). So let's see what the globe's leadership has been: Rwanda Genocide (disaster), Kosovo (disaster when you consider it took almost a decade to act), Sudan (disaster), Middle East (disaster).&nbsp; At least its consistent. So why would we want to work with an international community that has been wrong or slow so many times?&nbsp; Should the US side with partnership when the partner is wrong?&nbsp; Is it the fault of the US (read, George Bush) that he understands a very simple concept: to do nothing between a fight between good and evil is to serve evil?&nbsp; If he's so dumb, why is he the only one that gets it? 
