  The Washington Post ran an urlLink interesting article this morning about a debate between Nader and Dean on whether or not Nader should run.
Now, I know most of you don’t care to hear either of these men speak, unless they are overshadowed by your own angry, belligerent commentary, but I think it might be interesting for those people who are wondering about the viability of a third-party candidate. I, for one, am skeptical that the American majoritarian voting system can ever support a successful third party – and this is especially relevant for those of you who are thinking about voting for Michael Badnarik. Is voting for a third party actually going to make a difference (or change someone’s mind), or are you simply throwing away your vote? 
