JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications

From: Bill Pugh (pugh@cs.umd.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:52:47 EDT

Next message: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JSR-133 Community Review document; submit to JCP tomorrow"
Previous message: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Proof that reordering transformation are legal"
Next in thread: David Holmes: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications"
Reply: David Holmes: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications"
Maybe reply: Sylvia Else: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

It didn't seem that any clear consensus was reached on lost
notifications. If someone else wants to lead the charge on doing the
cat herding on this, feel free, but do it quickly. My current plans
are to not make any requirements on lost notification in JSR-133.

Bill
-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel

Next message: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JSR-133 Community Review document; submit to JCP tomorrow"
Previous message: Bill Pugh: "JavaMemoryModel: Proof that reordering transformation are legal"
Next in thread: David Holmes: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications"
Reply: David Holmes: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications"
Maybe reply: Sylvia Else: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:50 EDT