RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions

From: David Holmes (dholmes@dltech.com.au)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 18:47:08 EST


> But, as the main advocate of prefer-IE policy, I'm getting
> to think it is worth giving this up for the sake of avoiding
> yet more years of confusion and unintended non-portability.

Do you still propose that the implementation have the freedom to
treat:

  o.notify();
  t.interrupt();

as

  t.interrupt();
  o.notify();

or will strict ordering now be enforced?

David Holmes

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:55 EDT