Team Meeting for Perspective-Based Reading

In this session subjects were asked to meet as a team and produce a final list of faults and errors. Partly this was to see how difficult of a job it would be to error and fault lists, with each member of the team having applied a different perspective for reviewing the document.

Teams were assigned as explained in session 1C.

On average, teams in our study took 2.4 hrs to complete their meeting.

Description and Training

• We provided an overview of the session to our subjects. Again, there are many details specific to our environment that will need to be changed if this document is reused.
• We did not provide any training as to how the team should accomplish its task of producing representative fault and error lists. This was due to the fact that we were unsure what would be the best way to approach merging lists at the level of abstraction of errors. We therefore allowed the teams to do whatever they felt was useful and asked them to explain the process they used on questionnaire 2.3 (see Data Collection and Questionnaires, below).

Handouts

Experimental Artifacts

Data Collection and Questionnaires

• Form 2.3 was provided as a template for submitting the fault list for the team. There was also a questionnaire which we asked to be submitted for each team member.

Web Accessibility